Skip to main content

Security report for storefront.com

Storefront.com Online Inc. · Retail · N/a

Low risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Storefront.com Online Inc. is a medium-sized technology and retail-focused company specializing in personalized print-on-demand and imaging solutions for enterprise retailers and industry suppliers. Established since 1999, the company offers a suite of services including online platforms, secure kiosk sales, backlab production workflows, and systems management solutions. The website reflects a professional business presence with consistent branding and clear service offerings but lacks comprehensive privacy, cookie, and security policy disclosures. Technically, the website employs Bootstrap 4.1.3 and jQuery 3.3.1, indicating a moderately modern tech stack with good mobile responsiveness and navigation clarity. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and HTTPS status information suggests room for improvement in security hardening. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. From a security perspective, the domain is well-established with a long registration period and domain locking, supporting legitimacy. Yet, the lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosures points to a low maturity in security governance. No critical vulnerabilities or adult content were found, and the site is accessible without WAF blocking. Overall, the website scores moderately in content quality and business credibility but scores lower in privacy compliance and security posture. Strategic improvements in security policies, privacy disclosures, and technical security controls are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching storefront.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
85
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Storefront.com operates in the retail and technology sectors, targeting enterprise retailers and industry suppliers with personalized print-on-demand and imaging solutions. Their business model focuses on providing technology platforms and workflow management tools that streamline retail operations and enable new revenue streams through personalization. The company has a long-standing market presence since 1999, supported by a domain registered since 1994. The absence of contact details and social media presence on the website may limit direct customer engagement. No partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly identified. The company’s competitive advantage lies in its integrated suite of solutions covering online, kiosk, backlab, and systems management channels. Growth indicators are not visible on the site, and no certifications or trust badges are displayed.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with domain locking and a long registration period indicating legitimacy. However, the lack of DNSSEC, security headers, and visible HTTPS status reduces the overall security maturity. No privacy or cookie policies are published, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, indicating gaps in compliance and security governance. The absence of analytics and tracking scripts suggests minimal privacy risks from user tracking. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The security score is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing standard security headers, enabling DNSSEC, publishing privacy and security policies, and ensuring HTTPS enforcement.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve DNS security.
  2. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  5. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts and consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Storefront.com Online Inc.
Description
A trusted provider to enterprise retailers and industry suppliers since 1999, Storefront offers a powerful suite of technologies enabling businesses to improve operations and exploit new opportunities in personalization and print on demand. Their industry-leading in-store and online imaging solutions promote sales and streamline workflow to increase revenue.
Key services
Personalized Print-On-Demand ONLINE platform, Secure Android-based KIOSK sales platform, Streamlined BACKLAB production workflow, SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT control center for systems and applications
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 4.1.3, jQuery 3.3.1
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status includes clientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited to prevent unauthorized changes

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on main pages
  2. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided
  3. No social media links detected
  4. No forms present on the homepage
  5. Website uses Bootstrap and jQuery for UI
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected
  7. No security or incident response information published
  8. Content is focused on personalized print-on-demand solutions for retail
  9. Domain is well maintained with long expiry and transfer locks
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Bootstrap 4.1.3 and jQuery 3.3.1, indicating a moderately modern front-end technology stack. The HTML structure is valid and includes responsive design elements for mobile optimization. Performance is likely moderate given the use of standard libraries and no heavy scripts detected. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly identified, though DNS servers include cloudns.net, suggesting third-party DNS hosting. The site lacks advanced SEO features such as Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility features are basic, with no ARIA roles or landmarks detected. No analytics or tracking technologies are present, indicating minimal technical tracking footprint. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with storefront.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review storefront.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.