Skip to main content

Security report for storck.us

Storck USA, L.P. · Retail · United States

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Email security and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Storck USA, L.P. operates as a confectionery company with a portfolio of well-known candy brands targeted at consumers in the United States. The website serves as a corporate and brand information portal, showcasing products, company vision, career opportunities, and latest news. The site is built on TYPO3 CMS and employs modern JavaScript libraries and Piwik PRO for analytics, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The presence of cookie consent and a comprehensive privacy policy reflects attention to privacy compliance. However, the absence of visible contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage suggests contact is managed through dedicated service pages. Security posture is moderate with no visible security headers and no explicit incident response or security policy information publicly available. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, but the website's professional presentation and brand consistency support its legitimacy. Overall, the site is well-structured, user-friendly, and trustworthy for its intended audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching storck.us

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
80
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention storck.us, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for storck.us right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Storck USA, L.P. holds a solid position in the confectionery retail sector, leveraging multiple established brands such as Werther's Original, merci, and Mamba. The business model focuses on manufacturing and marketing confectionery products with consumer engagement through promotions and contests. The website reflects a medium-sized enterprise with consistent branding and a clear focus on the US market. The lack of direct contact information on the homepage may indicate a centralized customer service approach. The company maintains a partnership ecosystem visible through linked brand websites and the global Storck corporate site. Growth indicators include active news updates and career opportunities, suggesting ongoing business development and talent acquisition.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is implied but not explicitly confirmed in the HTML content. There is a cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy indicating GDPR compliance efforts. However, no HTTP security headers were detected in the provided content, and no explicit security or incident response policies are publicly disclosed. The use of third-party analytics (Piwik PRO) is managed with consent. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML. The absence of contact channels for security incidents and lack of a security.txt file are areas for improvement. Overall, the site is secure enough for corporate informational purposes but could enhance transparency and technical security measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance contact information visibility to improve user trust and support accessibility.
  5. Ensure SSL/TLS configuration is up to date and enforce HTTPS site-wide.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Storck USA, L.P.
Description
Storck USA, L.P. is a confectionery company offering various candy brands in the United States.
Key services
Confectionery product manufacturing, Brand marketing, Consumer engagement through promotions and contests
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, RequireJS, Lodash, jQuery, TYPO3 CMS, Piwik PRO Tag Manager
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Piwik PRO
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Piwik PRO
Marketing tools
Piwik PRO Tag Manager
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or registry data unavailability.
  3. Site uses TYPO3 CMS and modern JavaScript libraries.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and accessible.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage.
  6. Multiple brand pages and external brand websites linked.
  7. No visible security headers detected in HTML source.
  8. No forms detected on the homepage; contact likely via service page.
  9. No social media links explicitly found in the provided HTML.
  10. Site content is corporate and consumer-focused with no adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, a robust and widely used content management system, indicating a stable technical foundation. The use of RequireJS, Lodash, jQuery, and Piwik PRO Tag Manager reflects a modern JavaScript-based frontend architecture with asynchronous module loading and analytics integration. The site includes responsive design elements and accessibility features, supporting good mobile optimization and user experience. Performance is moderate, with multiple scripts loaded asynchronously and lazy loading of images. The absence of visible security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks that should be addressed to improve security and trustworthiness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with storck.us. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review storck.us.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.