Skip to main content

Security report for stomatologijasinstituts.lv

Rīgas Stradiņa universitātes stomatoloģijas institūts · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rīgas Stradiņa universitātes stomatoloģijas institūts is a leading dental healthcare and academic institution in Latvia and the Baltic region. The website presents a comprehensive overview of their multidisciplinary dental services, including clinics for orthodontics, implantology, oral surgery, and diagnostic radiology. The institute is affiliated with Rīgas Stradiņa universitāte, enhancing its credibility and academic standing. The site targets patients seeking advanced dental care and professionals interested in research and education in stomatology. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern frameworks like Bootstrap and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, with structured data enhancing search visibility. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced but lacks visible security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with cookie consent implemented but no clear privacy policy page found. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could improve transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stomatologijasinstituts.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention stomatologijasinstituts.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
4
Employees
3
Customers
1
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

Latest record dated 2026-05-13 · 1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for stomatologijasinstituts.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –mail.stomatologijasinstituts.lv2026-05-13
  • –mail.stomatologijasinstituts.lv2025-09-05
  • –mail.stomatologijasinstituts.lv2025-07-19

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The institute holds a strong market position as a leader in dental healthcare and research in the Baltic states. Its business model combines healthcare service provision with academic research and education. Key revenue streams likely include patient services across multiple specialized clinics and research grants. The target customer segments include local and regional patients requiring dental care and academic collaborators. The website content and structure indicate a mature digital presence with ongoing updates and news. Partnerships with Rīgas Stradiņa universitāte and presence of multiple specialized clinics suggest a robust operational ecosystem. Growth indicators include recent news about new centers and services. Strategic observations highlight the need for enhanced privacy and security transparency to align with regulatory expectations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS usage and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit security or incident response policies are published on the site, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. Cookie consent mechanisms indicate some GDPR awareness, but lack of a clear privacy policy and data protection officer contact suggests compliance gaps. The WHOIS data unavailability limits domain legitimacy verification, which is a risk factor. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but would benefit from implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and improving domain transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page clearly linked from the homepage and footer.
  3. Establish and publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy, including a security.txt file.
  4. Improve WHOIS data transparency by ensuring domain registration details are publicly accessible and consistent with the website's organizational information.
  5. Enhance user trust by providing explicit data protection officer contact information and GDPR compliance statements.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rīgas Stradiņa universitātes stomatoloģijas institūts
Description
RSU Stomatoloģijas institūts ir aprīkots ar pasaulē mūsdienīgākajām medicīniskajām iekārtām, tāpēc ārstnieciskajā darbā tiek izmantotas jaunākās tehnoloģijas un tehnikas stomatoloģijā.
Key services
Zobārstniecības klīnika, Zobu protezēšanas klīnika, Ortodontijas klīnika, Mutes, sejas un žokļu ķirurģijas klīnika, Implantoloģijas klīnika, Diagnostiskā radioloģija, Mutes medicīnas centrs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Bootstrap, Tiny Slider, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage (implied by https URLs)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed WordPress site for a dental institute affiliated with Rīgas Stradiņa universitāte.
  2. Content is in Latvian with English language option available.
  3. Site uses modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  4. No signs of malware, phishing, or adult content.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain trust verification.
  6. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented.
  7. No explicit privacy policy page found in the provided content.
  8. Contact information includes phone number and physical address with Google Maps link.
  9. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy.
  10. No explicit data protection officer contact found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Bootstrap framework and jQuery library, indicating a modern and maintainable tech stack. It uses Tiny Slider for carousel functionality and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile responsive and includes accessibility features such as font size adjustment and contrast settings. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format. Performance appears moderate with video content and multiple images, but no explicit performance metrics are available. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Technical risks include lack of security headers and incomplete WHOIS data, which could impact trust and security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stomatologijasinstituts.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stomatologijasinstituts.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.