Skip to main content

Security report for stomachillness.com

Healthcare · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.stomachillness.com is an informational health site focused on stomach diseases and related medical topics, primarily presented in French with multilingual navigation options. It serves a general audience seeking educational content about stomach health, symptoms, and treatments. The business model appears to be content-driven, possibly supported by advertising or affiliate links, with no clear commercial transactions or services offered directly on the site. Technically, the site is built with basic HTML and CSS, lacking modern frameworks or CMS indications. There is no evidence of advanced analytics, tracking, or security headers. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, and SEO practices appear minimal. The site does not provide privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, nor does it offer contact or incident response information, which limits trust and compliance. From a security perspective, the absence of WHOIS registration data is a significant concern, suggesting possible domain registration issues or privacy protection that is not justified by the business type. No HTTPS/SSL information was found in the provided data, which is a critical security gap. The site lacks security best practices such as security headers and secure forms. No vulnerabilities were explicitly detected, but the lack of security controls and transparency reduces the overall security posture. Overall, the website presents moderate content quality but suffers from critical security and compliance deficiencies. The domain legitimacy is questionable due to missing WHOIS data. Strategic improvements in security, privacy compliance, and transparency are essential to enhance trustworthiness and user safety.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stomachillness.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention stomachillness.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for stomachillness.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site targets a niche healthcare segment focused on stomach illnesses and digestive health education. It provides multilingual content, indicating an attempt to reach a broader international audience. The business model is informational, likely monetized through ads or affiliate marketing, as suggested by external links to unrelated commercial domains. There is no evidence of direct product sales or services. The lack of clear business identity, contact information, and certifications limits credibility. The partnership ecosystem includes some health-related and unrelated domains, which may dilute brand focus. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not discernible from the content. The site operates as a small-scale informational portal with limited market positioning.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low. Critical gaps include missing HTTPS/SSL configuration, absence of security headers, and no visible privacy or cookie policies. The lack of WHOIS registration data raises legitimacy concerns. There is no evidence of incident response readiness or security culture indicators. Compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations is not demonstrated. The site does not collect user data via forms beyond a basic search input, reducing exposure but also limiting engagement. Overall, the security posture is insufficient for a healthcare-related informational site, which should prioritize user trust and data protection.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and enhance transparency.
  3. Add clear contact information including email and phone for user support and incident reporting.
  4. Register the domain properly and ensure WHOIS data is accurate and publicly available to improve legitimacy.
  5. Incorporate security headers and conduct regular security audits to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website providing information on stomach health, stomach diseases, symptoms, treatments, and related health topics primarily in French language sections.
Key services
Health articles, Q&A on stomach issues, Multilingual health content
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is primarily in French with multilingual navigation links.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links detected.
  4. Site uses basic HTML and CSS without modern frameworks or scripts.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. External links include some unrelated or suspicious domains (e.g., cheap NFL jerseys).
  7. No security headers or HTTPS status information available from provided data.
  8. WHOIS data missing, indicating possible domain registration or data privacy issues.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML and CSS without modern JavaScript frameworks or CMS platforms. There is no evidence of analytics or tracking scripts, which limits data-driven insights but improves privacy. The site structure is simple with multilingual navigation links and categorized health content. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of optimization. Mobile responsiveness is basic but present. SEO optimization is minimal, lacking meta descriptions and structured data. The absence of security headers and HTTPS is a critical technical deficiency. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the provided data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stomachillness.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stomachillness.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.