Skip to main content

Security report for stmpdrcrds.com

STMPDRCRDS · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

STMPDRCRDS is a small music label focused on promoting electronic and dance music releases. The website showcases latest music releases with artist and track information, linking to major streaming platforms such as Spotify, Apple Music, and YouTube. The business operates primarily in the media industry with a niche audience of music listeners and fans. The domain is registered since 2016, consistent with the business age and activity. Technically, the website uses modern JavaScript frameworks like Alpine.js, Font Awesome icons, and is hosted on AWS Cloudfront CDN, providing moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, the site lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and contact information, which impacts its privacy compliance and security posture. Analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Bugsnag are used for tracking and error monitoring, indicating moderate user tracking. Overall, the website is professionally designed with consistent branding and a safe content profile, but improvements in security and privacy compliance are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stmpdrcrds.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
50
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a niche music label with a digital-first approach, leveraging social media and streaming platforms to reach its audience. The business model centers on music release promotion and demo submissions via a dedicated subdomain. The presence on multiple social media channels and streaming services suggests a strategy focused on audience engagement and digital distribution. The lack of detailed business registration or contact information on the site limits transparency but is common for small independent labels. The domain registration history supports legitimacy and continuity. Growth indicators include active content updates and social media activity. Partnerships appear limited to demo submission handling on a related subdomain.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate but with notable gaps. The site uses HTTPS and reputable hosting/CDN providers, which is positive. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and explicit privacy or cookie policies indicates incomplete security best practices. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, which could delay response to security issues. The use of third-party analytics and tracking scripts introduces privacy considerations without clear user consent mechanisms. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the site would benefit from enhanced security controls and compliance documentation to reduce risk and improve trust.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish clear and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance statements.
  4. Add explicit contact information including security or abuse contacts for incident response.
  5. Review and minimize third-party tracking scripts or implement user consent mechanisms to improve privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
STMPDRCRDS
Description
STMPDRCRDS is a music label or music-related business showcasing latest music releases and artists. The website features music covers, artist names, release titles, and links to streaming platforms such as Spotify, Apple Music, and YouTube.
Key services
Music release promotion, Demo submissions via demo.stmpdrcrds.com, Social media engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Alpine.js, Font Awesome, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Bugsnag
Frameworks
Alpine.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URLs)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Bugsnag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Bugsnag
Marketing tools
Bugsnag
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No privacy or cookie policy found on main site
  2. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed
  3. Social media presence is strong and consistent
  4. Website uses modern JavaScript frameworks and CDN hosting
  5. No security headers detected in provided data
  6. No forms present on main page except demo submission link to subdomain
  7. No explicit GDPR compliance indicators
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  9. No incident response or security contact information found
  10. Website content is music-focused and safe for general audiences
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with modern front-end technologies including Alpine.js for interactivity and Font Awesome for icons. It leverages AWS Cloudfront CDN for asset delivery, improving performance and scalability. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for analytics and marketing tracking, while Bugsnag is used for error monitoring. The site is mobile optimized and has a clean, professional design. However, no CMS or backend platform is explicitly detected. The absence of security headers and DNSSEC indicates technical debt in security hardening. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by optimizing scripts and assets. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal but present through meta tags and Open Graph data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stmpdrcrds.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stmpdrcrds.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.