Skip to main content

Security report for stiprakais.lv

AS Kredītinformācijas Birojs · Finance · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AS Kredītinformācijas Birojs operates a certification program called “STIPRĀKAIS LATVIJĀ” that recognizes the top 3.5% of Latvian companies with excellent credit ratings and financial discipline. The website serves as a marketing and informational platform for this certification, offering digital certificates, credit reports, and marketing materials to certified companies. The company is positioned as a trusted financial information provider in Latvia and is a member of the Creditinfo group, with ISO 27001 certification indicating a commitment to information security standards. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using common plugins and frameworks such as Bootstrap and jQuery, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and no exposed sensitive data, but lacks security headers and public security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could improve compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stiprakais.lv

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
27
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets financially strong Latvian companies seeking to differentiate themselves through creditworthiness certification. Revenue streams likely include certification fees and marketing services. The company leverages partnerships with Creditinfo and Bureau Veritas for credibility. The website content emphasizes exclusivity and marketing benefits for certified companies, indicating a niche market positioning. Social media and media publications support brand visibility. The business model combines financial data analysis with marketing and publicity services, aiming to enhance client business growth through trust signals.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and displays ISO 27001 certification, indicating a baseline security maturity. However, no security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) were detected, and no public incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are available. Tracking scripts from Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel are present, but no cookie consent mechanism is implemented, posing GDPR compliance risks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. Overall, security practices are moderate but could be improved with enhanced headers, transparency, and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  3. Publish an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure guidelines or security.txt file to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO metadata to improve user experience and search engine ranking.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
AS Kredītinformācijas Birojs
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AS Kredītinformācijas Birojs
Description
AS Kredītinformācijas Birojs issues the “STIPRĀKAIS LATVIJĀ” certificate to Latvian companies with excellent credit ratings and financial discipline. The certificate highlights companies among the elite 3.5% of Latvian businesses, providing marketing tools and public recognition to support business growth.
Key services
Credit rating reports, Digital certification, Marketing materials for certified companies, Publicity and media exposure
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Bootstrap, Hybrid Composer plugin, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security certification (ISO 27001) indicated

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
MonsterInsights (Google Analytics plugin), Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented in footer with email, phone, and physical address.
  4. Use of ISO 27001 certification badge indicates commitment to security standards.
  5. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and tracking scripts.
  6. No visible security headers detected; opportunity for security hardening.
  7. Marketing and analytics tools are used moderately with Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel.
  8. Content is business-focused, targeting Latvian companies seeking credit rating certification.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided publicly.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with Hybrid Composer plugin and Bootstrap framework, using jQuery 3.7.1. It loads external resources from Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and YouTube embeds. The site uses a parallax effect and responsive design techniques. Performance is moderate, with some heavy images and multiple external scripts. No critical technical issues or broken elements were detected. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but has basic mobile optimization. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured links but lacks JSON-LD or Open Graph metadata. Hosting provider details are not explicit from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stiprakais.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stiprakais.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.