Skip to main content

Security report for stieres.lv

SIA “Stieress” · Hospitality · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Stieress is a small hospitality business based in Latvia offering camping accommodations, summer camps for children and youth, and event hosting services near the sea. The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, featuring a responsive design with clear navigation and multilingual support. The technical infrastructure includes standard web technologies such as jQuery, Google Fonts, FontAwesome, and Google reCAPTCHA for form security. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism in place, but lacks advanced security headers and formal incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. Privacy compliance is adequate with accessible privacy and cookie policies aligned with GDPR requirements. Business credibility is supported by clear contact information, company registration details, and a professional presentation. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the website is functional, secure enough for its business scope, and trustworthy for its target audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stieres.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Stieress operates in the hospitality sector focusing on camping and leisure services in Latvia. Its business model centers on direct customer engagement through accommodation rentals, summer camps, and event hosting. The company targets families, youth, and corporate clients seeking seaside relaxation and recreational activities. The website supports this model with reservation forms and detailed service descriptions. Market positioning is local and niche, with no evident partnerships or subsidiaries. The company maintains a consistent brand image and provides essential trust signals such as contact details and policies. Growth opportunities could include expanding digital marketing and enhancing online booking capabilities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is properly configured, and Google reCAPTCHA is implemented on the contact form to mitigate spam. A cookie consent banner indicates awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could hinder timely handling of security issues. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries, but regular updates and security audits are recommended. Overall, the site is sufficiently secure for its business scale but can improve to align with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact to improve security transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.
  5. Consider adding terms of service and more comprehensive privacy documentation to strengthen legal compliance and user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
SIA “Stieress”
Registration number
40003769897
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA “Stieress”
Description
Kempings Stieress piedāvā relaksējošu atpūtu pie jūras, ar divvietīgām un četrvietīgām mājiņām, sporta aktivitātēm, bērnu un jauniešu vasaras nometnēm, kā arī svinību un pasākumu organizēšanu.
Key services
Naktsmītnes, Vasaras nometnes, Pasākumu organizēšana, Banketu galdu klāšana
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, jQuery, Google Fonts, FontAwesome, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Divi
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. Site uses WordPress with Divi theme and standard plugins.
  4. Contact information and policies are present and accessible.
  5. No security headers detected; SSL is properly configured.
  6. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
  7. Content is in Latvian with multilingual support (Russian, English).
  8. Cookie consent and privacy policy comply with GDPR basics.
  9. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
  10. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure info found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the Divi theme, leveraging jQuery and Google Fonts for UI/UX enhancements. It uses FontAwesome for icons and integrates Google reCAPTCHA for form security. The site loads CSS and JS resources asynchronously to improve performance. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. SEO basics are covered with meta tags and alternate language links. However, no advanced SEO or accessibility features are detected. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and resource optimization. No CDN or advanced security services detected. Overall, the technical setup is standard for a small hospitality website but could benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stieres.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stieres.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.