Skip to main content

Security report for stichtingdefriesland.nl

Stichting De Friesland · Healthcare · Netherlands

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Stichting De Friesland is a Dutch non-profit foundation focused on supporting innovative healthcare projects that improve the quality of care and life for people. The website presents clear information about their mission, supported projects, and application procedures, targeting healthcare organizations and innovators. The foundation appears to have a solid market position within the regional healthcare sector in the Netherlands, with consistent branding and trust indicators such as ANBI status and links to reputable partners like Achmea. Technically, the website is built on Sitecore CMS with Vue.js and jQuery, hosted likely on Microsoft Azure. However, the site suffers from a lack of a valid SSL certificate and does not support modern TLS protocols, which significantly impacts its security posture. Performance is slow, with a high page load time, and some DNS misconfigurations are present. Privacy compliance is basic but present, with privacy and cookie policies available. Contact information is limited to a contact form, with no direct emails or phone numbers found. Overall, the site is functional and professional but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stichtingdefriesland.nl

This scan found 10 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
97
Security headers
85
Email security
100
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation operates in the healthcare and non-profit sectors, providing funding and support for care improvement projects. It maintains partnerships with several healthcare insurers and organizations such as Zilveren Kruis, Achmea, and Interpolis, indicating a strong ecosystem presence. The business model is grant-based support for healthcare innovation. The website content and structure reflect a clear focus on transparency and stakeholder engagement, with video content and detailed navigation. No direct revenue streams or commercial activities are evident, consistent with a non-profit entity. The domain registration and DNS setup align with professional standards, reinforcing legitimacy.

Security posture

The website demonstrates moderate security maturity with proper use of security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection. However, the invalid SSL certificate and absence of TLS protocol support represent critical vulnerabilities that expose users to risks such as data interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found. The site uses secure cookie attributes but could improve by enabling OCSP stapling and session resumption. Lack of published security or incident response policies suggests limited transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture requires immediate improvement in SSL/TLS configuration to meet modern standards and ensure user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL certificate to enable HTTPS and secure user connections.
  2. Enable TLS 1.2 or higher protocols and disable deprecated versions to enhance encryption strength.
  3. Properly configure and enable HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload options to enforce HTTPS.
  4. Publish clear security and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Review and tighten Content Security Policy to reduce use of 'unsafe-eval' and 'unsafe-inline' directives.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Stichting De Friesland
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern CMS platform (Sitecore) with Vue.js and jQuery libraries, indicating a hybrid approach to frontend development. Hosting appears to be on Microsoft Azure, supported by IP and MX records. Despite a modern tech stack, the site suffers from slow loading times and lacks a valid SSL certificate, which is a critical technical flaw. The presence of Relay42 scripts shows integration with marketing and tracking tools. Accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic, with room for improvement in meta descriptions and structured data. The site is mobile responsive and has consistent branding. Technical debt is evident in DNS misconfigurations and missing security features, which could impact business operations if not addressed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stichtingdefriesland.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stichtingdefriesland.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.