Skip to main content

Security report for stereotaxis.com

Stereotaxis · Healthcare · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Stereotaxis is a healthcare technology company specializing in pioneering endovascular robotics to advance interventional medicine. The company targets healthcare professionals, patients, caregivers, and investors, positioning itself as an innovator in robotic systems for cardiac and vascular procedures. The website content reflects a professional and consistent brand with clear messaging about their business focus and services. Technically, the site uses modern frontend technologies including Bootstrap 4, jQuery, and Google Fonts, hosted behind a Sucuri Cloudproxy WAF. However, the site suffers from a critical security issue: the SSL certificate is invalid or missing, and no TLS protocols are enabled, severely impacting secure communications. Security headers are present but cannot compensate for the lack of valid HTTPS. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, and no contact emails or phone numbers are publicly listed, limiting transparency and user trust. The site integrates Google Analytics for user tracking but lacks clear privacy compliance indicators. Overall, the site is functional and professional but requires urgent security and privacy improvements to meet industry standards.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of stereotaxis.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stereotaxis.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
80
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the healthcare and medical technology sectors, focusing on robotic solutions for endovascular procedures. Their business model includes product development, clinical support, and patient education. The presence of investor relations and career pages indicates a medium-sized enterprise with growth ambitions. The company maintains a strong social media presence across major platforms, enhancing brand visibility and stakeholder engagement. Partnerships with related domains focused on patient care and physician resources suggest a well-integrated ecosystem. The lack of explicit privacy and security policies online may pose risks to reputation and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The security posture is currently weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, which are critical for protecting data in transit. While security headers such as X-XSS-Protection, X-Frame-Options, and Content-Security-Policy are implemented, they cannot mitigate the fundamental risk of unencrypted connections. The use of Sucuri Cloudproxy WAF provides some protection against attacks, but no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available. The site does not implement cookie consent mechanisms or GDPR compliance indicators, which may expose the company to regulatory risks. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues and publication of security policies are recommended.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and install a valid SSL certificate to enable HTTPS and secure all user connections.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or higher) and configure OCSP stapling and session resumption for performance and security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  4. Add visible contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve transparency and user trust.
  5. Develop and publish security policies including incident response and vulnerability disclosure procedures to enhance security posture and stakeholder confidence.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Bootstrap 4 and jQuery, with fonts loaded from Google Fonts and icons from FontAwesome. It is partially powered by WordPress but includes custom theme files. Hosting is via Sucuri Cloudproxy, providing WAF protection. Performance metrics are unavailable, but the use of video backgrounds and multiple CSS files suggests moderate load times. Mobile optimization appears good based on responsive design elements. SEO is basic with meta description present but no Open Graph or structured data detected. Accessibility features are minimal. The invalid SSL certificate and lack of TLS protocols represent significant technical debt and risk. Modernization efforts should focus on securing transport layers and enhancing privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stereotaxis.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stereotaxis.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.