Skip to main content

Security report for steady.page

Lex Wibor Warszawa · Finance · Poland

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lex Wibor Warszawa is a niche financial media publication focused on educating consumers about credit contract analysis. It operates on the Steady platform, offering subscription-based access to its content. The website demonstrates a good level of professionalism with clear branding, consistent content quality, and a user-friendly design optimized for mobile devices. Technically, it employs modern web technologies, integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, and uses strong security measures including HTTPS and Cloudflare services. The cookie consent mechanism is comprehensive and GDPR compliant, reflecting a strong privacy posture. However, the absence of explicit Terms of Service and security policy pages, as well as lack of direct contact information, are areas for improvement. Overall, the site is trustworthy, secure, and well-positioned within its niche market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching steady.page

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
54
Security headers
60
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention steady.page, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for steady.page right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate steady.page and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
1
Registered
1
Resolving
1
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-06-19

Masked preview

  • st••••••••.comMediumvarious

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of steady.page with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The publication targets financially aware consumers interested in understanding and analyzing their credit agreements. Its business model relies on content subscriptions via Steady, leveraging partnerships with payment processors like Stripe and marketing tools such as Intercom and Typeform. The extensive use of third-party analytics indicates a data-driven approach to audience engagement and marketing. The company maintains a consistent brand presence and leverages social media channels for outreach. While the site is small in size, it shows signs of a mature digital presence with potential for growth in the financial education sector.

Security posture

The website exhibits a strong security posture with enforced HTTPS, robust security headers, and bot protection via Cloudflare Turnstile captcha. Payment processing is securely handled by Stripe, minimizing exposure to sensitive data. The detailed cookie consent and privacy policy demonstrate compliance with GDPR. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were detected in the analysis. However, the lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. Adding these would enhance trust and preparedness for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear Terms of Service page to cover legal aspects of content use and subscriptions.
  2. Add a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Provide explicit business contact information including emails and phone numbers to enhance credibility and user trust.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party integrations to ensure no vulnerable libraries or outdated components are used.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lex Wibor Warszawa
Description
Lex Wibor Warszawa is a publication focused on financial awareness, specifically related to credit agreements and their analysis. It provides articles to help consumers understand and analyze their credit contracts.
Key services
Educational articles on credit agreements, Subscription-based content access, Newsletter subscription
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare Turnstile Captcha, Cookiebot, Unpoly.js, PostHog (analytics), Heap Analytics, RudderStack, Mixpanel, Intercom, Stripe (payment processing), Tally.so (forms), Vimeo (video content), Spotify (audio content)
Frameworks
Unpoly.js
Platforms
Steady.page
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular control
  • Use of Cloudflare Turnstile captcha for bot protection
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • Secure payment processing via Stripe

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, PostHog, Heap Analytics, Mixpanel, Quantcast
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Twitter Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Twitter Pixel, Mixpanel, Heap Analytics, Quantcast
Marketing tools
Intercom, RudderStack, Typeform, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with strong security headers
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with detailed cookie categorization
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the analyzed page
  4. No Terms of Service or explicit security policy pages found
  5. Extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing tools
  6. Content is professionally presented and relevant to financial education
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom CMS platform provided by Steady, utilizing modern JavaScript frameworks and libraries such as Unpoly.js. It integrates multiple third-party services for analytics (Google Analytics, PostHog, Heap, Mixpanel), marketing (Intercom, RudderStack, Typeform), and media content (Vimeo, Spotify). Hosting and security are managed via Cloudflare, providing performance optimization and bot mitigation. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in load times by optimizing third-party scripts and assets.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100 −1Medium27 findingsView report
  2. 76/100Low26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with steady.page. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review steady.page.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.