Skip to main content

Security report for staylive.nz

StayLive · Energy · New Zealand

Partial score · DNS & email only

67/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

StayLive is a New Zealand-based organization focused on championing health and safety interests within the electrical industry. The website serves as a hub for shared learnings, working groups, guidelines, and competency tools aimed at improving health, safety, and wellbeing practices. The presence of major New Zealand energy companies as partners and the professional design of the site position StayLive as a credible industry leader in its sector. Technically, the website is built on the MoST Content Management System and utilizes common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Slick Slider. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for user tracking. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation and content relevance, though accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic. No blocking or WAF mechanisms were detected, indicating full accessibility. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies. There is no public incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency and trustworthiness somewhat, though the website content and partner logos mitigate this concern. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with better policy disclosures and security headers. Strategically, StayLive should focus on enhancing privacy compliance, adding clear security policies, and verifying domain registration details to strengthen trust. The site effectively serves its target audience but would benefit from improved transparency and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching staylive.nz

This scan found 19 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
67

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention staylive.nz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for staylive.nz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

StayLive operates as an important entity within the New Zealand energy sector, specifically targeting health and safety in the electrical industry. Its business model appears to be non-profit or industry advocacy focused, providing guidelines, shared learnings, and competency tools. The organization leverages partnerships with major energy companies, enhancing its market position and credibility. The website content and partner ecosystem indicate a stable medium-sized organization with a clear focus on industry leadership in health and safety. Growth indicators include digital competency tools and active working groups. Revenue streams are not explicit but likely come from membership or industry support. The partnership ecosystem is strong, with multiple well-known energy companies featured prominently.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, but no security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS were detected. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in the HTML content. However, the lack of privacy and cookie policies, absence of incident response contacts, and no vulnerability disclosure program indicate compliance gaps. Data protection practices are unclear, and user tracking is moderate via Google Analytics without visible consent mechanisms. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not publicly documented. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and trust standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with visible consent mechanisms to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to enhance transparency and readiness.
  4. Verify and publish domain registration details to improve trust and legitimacy perception.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimizations to improve user experience and reach.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
StayLive
Description
StayLive champions the health and safety interests of people in the electrical industry. We harness national and worldwide insights to drive real improvements in health, safety and wellbeing.
Key services
Shared Learnings, Working Groups, Guidelines, Safety Alerts, Competency Tools
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Slick Slider, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, MoST Content Management V3.0.9220
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by https URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries explicitly detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, which is unusual and reduces transparency.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact is only via a contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  5. Site uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking with no visible cookie consent mechanism.
  6. Site content is focused on health and safety in the NZ electrical industry with multiple working groups and guidelines.
  7. Partner logos of major NZ energy companies add trust signals.
  8. Technical stack is based on MoST CMS with common JS libraries.
  9. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL status unknown but URL is HTTPS.
  10. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the MoST Content Management System, leveraging jQuery and Slick Slider for UI components. It uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking user behavior. The site is mobile optimized with responsive navigation menus and sliders. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. However, there is room for improvement in accessibility and SEO best practices. No hosting provider information was detected. The technical stack is stable but somewhat dated, with opportunities for modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with staylive.nz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review staylive.nz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.