Skip to main content

Security report for staylive.io

Staylive AB · Media · Sweden

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Staylive AB is a Swedish technology company specializing in providing white-label streaming platforms for content creators, sports federations, leagues, and clubs. Their platform enables clients to build custom streaming services with features such as live and on-demand content, payment integration, mobile app publishing, and full ownership of content and users. Positioned as a stable and secure solution, Staylive serves a medium-sized market segment with notable partnerships and client testimonials, including a recent acquisition by Two Circles, enhancing their market presence. Technically, Staylive's website is built on Webflow and integrates modern analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and LinkedIn Insight. The platform supports multi-device streaming including iOS, Android, and Apple TV. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in security headers and privacy documentation. From a security perspective, Staylive employs HTTPS with SSL encryption and complies with payment security standards (PA-DSS PCI). Cookie consent is implemented with an opt-in mechanism, reflecting basic GDPR compliance. However, explicit privacy policies, terms of service, and security incident response contacts are not clearly presented, representing areas for enhancement. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious indicators were detected. Overall, Staylive presents a professional and trustworthy online presence with strong business credibility and a solid technical foundation. The lack of WHOIS transparency is mitigated by the company's evident market position and parent company association. Strategic improvements in security policies, privacy documentation, and accessibility would further strengthen their digital maturity and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching staylive.io

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Staylive operates in the media and technology sectors, targeting organizations requiring custom streaming solutions. Their B2B SaaS model focuses on monetization through subscriptions and one-time payments. The company leverages partnerships, notably with Two Circles, to expand its market reach. Client logos and testimonials indicate a strong foothold in sports streaming. The platform's modular features and multi-platform support provide competitive advantages. Growth indicators include recent acquisitions and expanding partnerships. The company maintains a professional brand image and consistent messaging, supporting trust and customer engagement.

Security posture

Staylive demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforcement, SSL encryption, and adherence to payment security standards. The presence of cookie consent mechanisms indicates awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests gaps in comprehensive security governance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The website could benefit from implementing additional security headers and publishing formal security documentation to enhance transparency and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the homepage.
  2. Implement and publicize a security policy including incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure procedures.
  3. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet recognized standards for broader user inclusivity.
  5. Regularly review and update cookie consent mechanisms to ensure full GDPR compliance and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Staylive AB
Description
Staylive provides a platform to create and monetize custom streaming services with features such as editing tools, payment setup, full ownership, live and on-demand streaming, mobile apps, and security.
Key services
White-label streaming platform, Subscription and payment integration, Mobile app publishing, Live and on-demand streaming, Content ownership and platform control
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Finsweet Cookie Consent, YouTube embedded video, jQuery 3.5.1, Advanced Webflow Forms
Platforms
Web, iOS, Android, Apple TV
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • SSL encryption
  • Payment standards compliance (PA-DSS PCI)
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy or query failure.
  3. Strong branding and consistent design throughout the site.
  4. Multiple client logos and testimonials enhance trust.
  5. Cookie consent implemented with opt-in mechanism.
  6. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on homepage.
  7. Contact emails use company domain and are clearly business-related.
  8. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly listed.
  9. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  10. Security best practices partially implemented but could be improved.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern web technologies including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Finsweet Cookie Consent. The infrastructure supports multi-platform streaming with native apps for iOS, Android, and Apple TV. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The technical stack is modern and well-integrated, though the absence of some security headers and detailed privacy documentation indicates areas for technical enhancement to reduce risk and improve compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with staylive.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review staylive.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.