Skip to main content

Security report for starkamstandort.de

Verband Forschender Arzneimittelhersteller e.V. (vfa) · Healthcare · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website starkamstandort.de serves as an informational and advocacy platform for the pharmaceutical industry in Germany, operated under the umbrella of the Verband Forschender Arzneimittelhersteller e.V. (vfa). It highlights the importance of pharma as a key industry through events, policy discussions, and economic insights, targeting policymakers, industry stakeholders, and the general public interested in healthcare innovation. The site is well-branded, consistent, and professionally designed, reflecting a large and established organization with significant market influence. Technically, the site is built on the Contao Open Source CMS, utilizing modern web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Swiper for responsive and interactive user experience. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, with comprehensive metadata and structured data enhancing discoverability. Performance is moderate, with no critical technical issues detected. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. It uses secure session management and CSRF protection cookies. However, it lacks explicit security headers and published security policies or incident response contacts, which are recommended for enhanced security posture. No vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns were detected. Overall, the site presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility and compliance posture. Strategic recommendations include adding security headers, publishing a security policy, and providing clearer contact information for incident response to further strengthen trust and security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  5. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching starkamstandort.de

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention starkamstandort.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for starkamstandort.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The vfa represents a major segment of the German pharmaceutical market, with members accounting for over two-thirds of the market share and employing approximately 102,000 people. The website functions as a communication and advocacy tool, promoting innovation, research, and economic competitiveness in the pharma sector. It organizes and reports on industry events, fostering dialogue between politics, industry, and society. The business model centers on industry representation and policy influence rather than direct commercial sales. The site’s partnership with the main vfa domain and active social media presence supports a broad engagement strategy. Growth indicators include regular event hosting and updated content reflecting current political and economic topics.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms that respect user privacy and GDPR compliance. The presence of CSRF protection cookies and session management indicates attention to common web security practices. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No incident response or security contact information is published, which limits transparency and readiness for security events. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with additional headers and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide clear incident response contact channels to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a terms of service page to complete legal documentation and improve user trust.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure privacy compliance and minimize unnecessary data collection.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Verband Forschender Arzneimittelhersteller e.V. (vfa)
Description
Die Website informiert über die Bedeutung der Pharmaindustrie in Deutschland als Schlüsselindustrie, die durch Forschung und Innovation zur Gesundheitsversorgung und wirtschaftlichen Stärke beiträgt. Es werden Veranstaltungen, politische Themen und wirtschaftliche Aspekte rund um die Pharmaindustrie präsentiert.
Key services
Informationsbereitstellung, Veranstaltungsorganisation, Politische Interessenvertretung
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Swiper, Colorbox, Contao CMS
Frameworks
Contao Open Source CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • CSRF protection cookie present
  • Session management via PHP SESSION ID cookie

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about pharmaceutical industry in Germany.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with clear opt-in/out options.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on main page; contact form is available.
  5. No terms of service page detected.
  6. Social media presence is strong with official vfa accounts linked.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (Contao).
  8. Good SEO and metadata implementation including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data.
  9. No security headers detected in provided data; recommend adding for improved security posture.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Contao CMS platform, leveraging jQuery, Bootstrap, Swiper, and Colorbox libraries for UI and interactivity. The site uses modern responsive design techniques and includes comprehensive meta tags and JSON-LD structured data for SEO. Performance is moderate with lazy loading of images and optimized assets. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented via a Contao cookie bar script, supporting GDPR compliance. No hosting provider details were identified from the data. The site lacks some advanced security headers but otherwise follows good web development practices. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and security headers to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with starkamstandort.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review starkamstandort.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.