Security report for stapro.sk
STAPRO SLOVENSKO s.r.o. · Healthcare · Slovakia
STAPRO SLOVENSKO s.r.o. is a well-established provider of healthcare information systems and IT services, primarily serving healthcare providers, hospitals, and laboratories in Slovakia and Central Europe. Founded in 2003, the company offers a comprehensive product suite under the FONS brand, including clinical, laboratory, management, and integration systems designed to improve healthcare quality and operational efficiency. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear contact information and multilingual support, indicating a mature digital footprint. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and libraries such as jQuery, MasterSlider, and Complianz for GDPR compliance. Hosting appears to be managed by SWAN, a Slovak provider, consistent with the domain's WHOIS data. The site is mobile-optimized and includes SEO best practices, though some accessibility features could be enhanced. Analytics are implemented via Google Analytics and Tag Manager with user consent mechanisms in place. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent banners aligned with GDPR. However, explicit security headers like CSP and X-Frame-Options are not visibly configured, and no public security policy or incident response contacts are provided. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The domain registration data is consistent with the business claims, showing a long-standing presence and legitimate registration. Overall, the website demonstrates a solid business and technical foundation with good privacy compliance and moderate security posture. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response transparency, and accessibility would further enhance trust and resilience.
Scanned
NIS2 and GDPR posture
- NIS2 outside view
- Not assessed
- GDPR outside view
- Not assessed
Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.
Priority findings
No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.
Email security
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
- Medium
DMARC not enforcing
DMARC policy is set to "none"
What to do: Gradually move to "quarantine" then "reject" policy
- RFC 9989 §5.1.7
- NIS2 21(2)(e)
- IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(k): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(k): Network security
- Medium
No DKIM record found
DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
What to do: Configure DKIM with your email provider
- Medium
No MTA-STS Policy
MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks
- RFC 8461
- NIS2 21(2)(e)
- IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(k): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(k): Network security
- NIST SP 800-177r1
- Medium
SSL/TLS
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
- Medium
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
SSL certificate expires in 31 days
What to do: Plan SSL certificate renewal
- Medium
Mixed Content Detected
2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
What to do: Ensure all resources (images, scripts, stylesheets) are loaded over HTTPS
- Medium
Keep watching stapro.sk
This scan found 14 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended€25per month
- TLS certificates and expiry
- DNS records
- SPF, DKIM and DMARC
- Security headers
- GDPR and NIS2 posture
- Exposed services
- Third-party trackers
- Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
Full report
€39.90one-time
- The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
- Email delivery with an unlock code
- Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
- SSL/TLS
- 85
- Email security
- 60
- DNS health
- 65
- Network security
- 100
- Average
- 78
- After the cap
- 75
Not counted
- Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
- GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
- NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
- OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
- The certificate is not trusted by browsers
- The website is not served over HTTPS
- A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
- The page loads a script from a compromised source
- The domain registration has expired
- SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
- Critical0–25
- High26–49
- Medium50–75
- Low76–100
Technical appendix
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Security posture
Recommendations
- Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
- Publish a clear security policy and provide dedicated incident response contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
- Create and maintain a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
- Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to minimize risks from outdated components.
- Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Contact details published on the site
- Addresses
- Legal name
- STAPRO SLOVENSKO s.r.o.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
- Company
- STAPRO SLOVENSKO s.r.o.
- Description
- Sme významným dodávateľom informačných systémov a zároveň aj poskytovateľom služieb v oblasti informačných technológií pre zdravotníctvo.
- Key services
- Healthcare information systems, Clinical systems, Laboratory and radiodiagnostic solutions, Management systems, Integration and communication products, Hosting and outsourcing services
- Content quality
- good
- Branding
- consistent
Technology
- Stack
- WordPress 6.8.3, jQuery 3.2.1, Google Analytics, MasterSlider 3.5.5, Complianz GDPR/CCPA Cookie Consent plugin
- Frameworks
- WordPress
- Platforms
- Web
- Performance
- moderate
- Mobile
- good
- Accessibility
- basic
- SEO
- good
Security
- Observed score
- 85/100
- Good practices seen
- HTTPS enforced
- Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- No visible vulnerable libraries detected
Analytics and tracking
- Services
- Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
- Tracking level
- moderate
- Privacy practices
- good
Advertising
- Marketing tools
- Complianz GDPR Cookie Consent
- Transparency
- good
Site quality
- Design
- good
- User experience
- good
- Content relevance
- good
- Navigation
- good
- Professionalism
- good
- Trustworthiness
- high
Key observations
- Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
- Content is focused on healthcare IT solutions and services.
- Strong GDPR compliance with cookie consent and privacy policy.
- Professional design and consistent branding.
- Multiple language support indicated by hreflang tags.
- Use of modern web technologies and CMS (WordPress).
- Contact information is clearly presented and verified.
- No security policy or incident response info publicly available.
- No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes
Notes
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
- MITRE CWE (opens in a new tab)4.20 (2026-04-30) · CWE Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP Top 10:2025 (opens in a new tab)2025 (membership per CWE 4.20) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- MITRE CAPEC (opens in a new tab)3.9 (2023-01-24) · CAPEC Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP ASVS (opens in a new tab)5.0.0 · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (opens in a new tab)latest (checklist.json, master) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Secure Headers Project (opens in a new tab)2026-10-18 · Apache-2.0
- Mozilla Server Side TLS (intermediate) (opens in a new tab)6.0 · MPL-2.0
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 (OSCAL catalog) (opens in a new tab)5.2.0 · Public domain (US Government work)
- Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 333, 27.12.2022 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 (opens in a new tab)OJ L, 18.10.2024 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 119, 4.5.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy), consolidated (opens in a new tab)19.12.2009 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- RFC Editor metadata (opens in a new tab)per-RFC (obsolete RFCs rejected) · IETF Trust Legal Provisions (metadata only)
- NIST CSRC, W3C TR, IETF Datatracker, EDPB, EUR-Lex CELLAR and gesetze-bayern.de (opens in a new tab)per document · Titles and links only
- NIST NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens in a new tab)live records · Public domain (NVD); CVE® records © MITRE, free use
- W3C WCAG 2.2 (opens in a new tab)W3C Recommendation (wcag.json) · W3C Software and Document License
- ETSI EN 301 549 (opens in a new tab)V3.2.1 (2021-03), clause headings · Clause numbers and titles only (© ETSI)
- Directive (EU) 2019/882 (European Accessibility Act) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 151, 7.6.2019 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive (EU) 2016/2102 (Web Accessibility Directive) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 327, 2.12.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Feedback on this report
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with stapro.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stapro.sk.