Skip to main content

Security report for stakingrewards.com

Staking Rewards · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Staking Rewards is a professional and leading institutional yield aggregator platform focused on crypto staking opportunities. The website offers verified staking providers, institutional staking strategies, and market insights to help users maximize staking returns. The platform targets both institutional and retail crypto investors seeking optimized staking yields. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as React and Next.js, hosted on Google Cloud infrastructure, and integrates analytics and customer engagement tools like New Relic and Intercom. The site is well optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and SEO. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and security headers, though some compliance aspects like cookie consent could be improved. The WHOIS data is not publicly available, likely due to privacy protection, which is common in the crypto industry. Overall, the platform demonstrates a high level of professionalism and trustworthiness with a solid market position in the crypto finance sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stakingrewards.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
35
Email security
80
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the finance and technology sectors, providing a niche service as a staking yield aggregator. It leverages partnerships with multiple staking providers and promotes institutional staking programs and events, indicating a strong ecosystem and market presence. The business model revolves around aggregating staking opportunities and offering verified providers to users, likely generating revenue through partnerships and institutional services. The platform's target audience includes institutional investors and crypto enthusiasts looking for reliable staking options. The presence of a Verified Staking Provider program and industry leader endorsements enhances its competitive advantage. Growth potential is supported by the expanding crypto staking market and institutional adoption.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled, comprehensive security headers, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The use of reputable third-party analytics and customer engagement tools is noted, though continuous monitoring for vulnerabilities in these dependencies is recommended. The absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests areas for improvement in transparency and readiness. GDPR compliance is partially addressed with a privacy policy, but cookie consent mechanisms are lacking. Overall, the security measures are adequate for the platform's operational needs but could be enhanced to meet higher compliance and incident management standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to ensure GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and readiness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Add clear and accessible contact information including support and sales channels to enhance user confidence.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Staking Rewards
Description
Staking Rewards is the leading institutional yield aggregator. Access market leading staking opportunities and earn 20% more on your crypto holdings.
Key services
Yield aggregation, Staking provider verification, Institutional staking strategies, Market insights, Staking provider program
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Google Tag Manager, New Relic, Intercom, Safary SDK
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure external scripts loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, New Relic
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, New Relic, Safary SDK, Intercom
Marketing tools
Intercom
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional crypto staking yield aggregator with institutional focus
  2. No WHOIS data available publicly, indicating privacy protection or new domain
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage
  4. Privacy policy and terms of service pages are present and comprehensive
  5. No cookie consent banner detected, potential GDPR compliance gap
  6. Uses modern web technologies and analytics tools
  7. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure found
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content
  9. Trusted by multiple industry leaders and staking providers
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, ensuring a performant and scalable front-end. Static assets are served via Google Cloud Storage, contributing to fast load times. Integration with analytics (New Relic, Microsoft Clarity) and customer engagement (Intercom) tools indicates a mature digital infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident from meta tags and structured data. No common CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary content management approach. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing security monitoring. Overall, the technical implementation supports a high-quality user experience and robust platform performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 72/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stakingrewards.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stakingrewards.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.