Skip to main content

Security report for stadtmagazin-bremen.de

Media · Germany

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Stadtmagazin Bremen is a local media outlet focused on providing news, events, and cultural information relevant to the Bremen area. The website serves residents and visitors interested in local happenings and cultural content. The business model revolves around media publication and event promotion within the Bremen community. Technically, the website is built on WordPress, uses Matomo for analytics, and Font Awesome for icons. Hosting appears to be provided by Ewetel, a German hosting provider. The site shows basic mobile optimization and moderate performance. Security posture is weak, with no detected security headers or explicit security policies, and no HTTPS status provided in the data. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no privacy or cookie policies found, and no consent mechanisms in place. Overall, the site is accessible and safe for general audiences but lacks advanced security and privacy features. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy policies, and contact transparency are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stadtmagazin-bremen.de

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention stadtmagazin-bremen.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for stadtmagazin-bremen.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as a regional media outlet serving the Bremen area, targeting local residents and visitors interested in cultural events and news. Its competitive advantage lies in localized content and event promotion. The business model is typical for media publications, likely relying on advertising and event partnerships. There is no evidence of large-scale enterprise operations or subsidiaries. The partnership ecosystem is not evident from the data. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not disclosed. The site uses standard web technologies and analytics tools, indicating moderate digital maturity.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low. The absence of security headers, lack of visible HTTPS confirmation, and missing security policies indicate potential vulnerabilities. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are found. Data protection officer contact information is absent, and GDPR compliance indicators are missing. The use of Matomo analytics suggests some privacy awareness, but overall privacy compliance is poor. The business impact of these gaps includes potential exposure to web-based attacks and regulatory non-compliance risks. Incident response readiness appears minimal, and security culture indicators are not evident.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and security posture.
  5. Provide clear contact information including security and incident response contacts to enhance trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Local Bremen city magazine providing news, events, and cultural information.
Key services
Local news, Event listings, Cultural articles
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Matomo Analytics, Font Awesome
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML content.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the provided content.
  4. Uses Matomo for analytics, indicating some privacy-conscious tracking.
  5. Font Awesome used extensively for icons.
  6. No security headers or advanced security policies detected in the provided data.
  7. WHOIS data is limited but consistent with hosting provider nameservers.
  8. Content is focused on local Bremen city news and events.
  9. No adult or explicit content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress, a widely used CMS, and uses Matomo for analytics, indicating a preference for privacy-friendly tracking. Font Awesome is used for iconography. Hosting is provided by Ewetel, a German hosting provider, consistent with the site's regional focus. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization. There is room for improvement in accessibility and SEO optimization. No advanced frameworks or platforms are detected. The technical stack is standard but lacks modern security and privacy enhancements. Technical debt may exist due to missing security best practices and incomplete policy implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stadtmagazin-bremen.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stadtmagazin-bremen.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.