Skip to main content

Security report for stabu100.lv

Dzīvojamā ēka Rīgas vēsturiskajā centrā · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website https://stabu100.lv/ represents a real estate business focused on selling new apartments in the historic center of Riga, Latvia. The company offers 33 high-quality apartments with modern amenities, energy efficiency, and parking facilities. The site targets potential buyers and investors interested in residential properties in Riga. The business appears to be a small local real estate developer or agent with a professional online presence including social media channels and structured data markup. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Elementor page builder and OceanWP theme. It incorporates modern technologies such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for marketing and analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and has good SEO practices, although accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and includes Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, several important security headers are missing, and no explicit privacy or cookie policies are present, which is a compliance gap especially under GDPR. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. Overall, the website is professionally designed and functional with moderate security posture. Key recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, adding security headers, and ensuring regular updates to maintain security and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stabu100.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the real estate sector, focusing on residential apartment sales in Riga's historic center. Its competitive advantage lies in offering modern, energy-efficient apartments with full finishing and parking options. The business model is direct sales and investment opportunities. The target market includes local and regional buyers and investors. The company maintains a digital presence with social media and structured data to enhance visibility. Growth indicators include active sales counters and 3D virtual tours to engage customers. The partnership ecosystem is limited to social media platforms and standard web services. Strategic observations suggest a focus on quality and location to differentiate in a competitive real estate market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and Google reCAPTCHA is used to mitigate spam and automated abuse. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Compliance gaps exist due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which are critical under GDPR. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident from the site. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small real estate site but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against web vulnerabilities.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  4. Establish and communicate an incident response plan and provide security contact information to improve trust and readiness.
  5. Consider conducting a security audit and penetration testing to identify and remediate hidden vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dzīvojamā ēka Rīgas vēsturiskajā centrā
Description
Jauni dzīvokļi Rīgas vēsturiskajā centrā ar pilnu apdari. A+ energoefektivitāte. Augsta kvalitāte. Ir stāvvietas. Labas cenas, mūsdienīga ēka.
Key services
Sale of new apartments, Consultations, 3D virtual tours
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, PHP, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
OceanWP theme, Elementor page builder
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • Facebook Pixel and Google Tag Manager scripts loaded securely

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed real estate sales platform for new apartments in Riga, Latvia.
  2. Content is in Latvian with Russian language alternate links.
  3. Contact information includes a Latvian phone number and company email.
  4. No privacy or cookie policies found on the main page.
  5. Uses modern web technologies and tracking scripts.
  6. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  7. No security policy or incident response information found.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using the Elementor page builder and OceanWP theme, indicating a flexible and widely supported infrastructure. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing, showing digital maturity in tracking user behavior. The site is mobile-optimized and uses structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced SEO and rich snippets. Performance is moderate with no critical issues detected. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The lack of advanced security headers and privacy compliance features indicates some technical debt and modernization opportunities. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but should be enhanced for security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stabu100.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stabu100.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.