Skip to main content

Security report for stables.money

Stables · Finance · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Stables is a fintech platform focused on enabling users to buy, sell, send, and spend stablecoins such as USDC, USDT, DAI, and PYUSD through a stablecoin card. The company positions itself as an innovator bridging cryptocurrency stablecoins with everyday financial transactions, targeting cryptocurrency users and fintech consumers. The website is built on modern technologies including Webflow CMS, Amplitude analytics, and Intercom chat, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks explicit privacy policy, terms of service, and security.txt for vulnerability disclosure. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection, which is common in fintech but reduces transparency. Overall, the website is professional and functional but could improve trust and compliance by publishing key policies and contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, LinkedIn, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stables.money

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Stables operates in the finance sector, specifically in cryptocurrency and stablecoin services. Its business model revolves around providing a card product that integrates stablecoins into daily spending, appealing to crypto holders seeking real-world usability. The company maintains active social media channels on Twitter, LinkedIn, Discord, and Telegram, supporting community engagement. The lack of visible company registration or contact details on the website suggests a startup or early-stage company. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS is typical for fintech startups to safeguard sensitive registrant data. The platform leverages analytics and marketing tools to optimize user engagement and growth.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent with opt-in mechanisms, reflecting good security hygiene. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No security policy or incident response contact information is provided, limiting transparency in security governance. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure program reduces the ability for external researchers to report issues responsibly. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by adopting additional security best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and expose security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Create a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure program to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Provide clear contact information including support and security incident response channels.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Stables
Description
One place to spend, send and earn stablecoins like USDC, USDT, BUSD. Until today you haven't been able to use stablecoins in the real world, now we're bringing them to your everyday life.
Key services
Buy stablecoins, Sell stablecoins, Send stablecoins, Spend stablecoins via card
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Fonts (Inconsolata), Amplitude Analytics, Intercom Chat Widget, Swiper.js, Finsweet Cookie Consent
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Amplitude, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Amplitude
Marketing tools
Intercom, Amplitude
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection or query failure.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with opt-in and preference center.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage.
  6. Website uses modern frontend technologies and analytics tools.
  7. Content is focused on stablecoin card fintech services.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No certifications or security frameworks explicitly mentioned.
  10. Social media presence includes Twitter, LinkedIn, Discord, and Telegram.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern frontend libraries such as Swiper.js for UI components and Amplitude for analytics. It uses Google Fonts and integrates Intercom for customer support chat. Hosting appears to be via Webflow's infrastructure, with assets served from their CDN. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph tags, and structured data in JSON-LD format. The site includes a cookie consent banner with preference management, indicating attention to privacy compliance. Technical risks include the lack of advanced security headers and incomplete privacy documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stables.money. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stables.money.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.