Skip to main content

Security report for ssen-transmission.co.uk

SSEN Transmission · Energy · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Email security and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SSEN Transmission is a key electricity transmission network operator in the United Kingdom, focused on delivering a reliable, resilient, and innovative energy transmission infrastructure. The company operates under the parent organization Scottish and Southern Electricity Networks (SSEN) and targets stakeholders in the energy sector including regulators and customers. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, emphasizing network safety, smart technology, and environmental sustainability. Technically, the website employs modern tools such as Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Azure Application Insights, and OneTrust for cookie consent, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is built on a CMS platform likely Episerver, hosted on Microsoft Azure, and demonstrates good performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, implements multiple security headers, and integrates cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting a strong security posture. However, explicit security policies and incident response information are not prominently available, suggesting room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional with no signs of blocking or WAF interference. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to the domain being a subdomain, which is consistent with the organizational structure. Strategic recommendations include publishing detailed security policies, vulnerability disclosure information, and enhancing visibility of data protection contacts to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ssen-transmission.co.uk

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
85
Email security
50
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ssen-transmission.co.uk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for ssen-transmission.co.uk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SSEN Transmission holds a significant market position as a large-scale energy transmission operator in the UK, operating under the SSEN group. Their business model centers on infrastructure management, network innovation, and service reliability. The company targets energy sector stakeholders, regulators, and customers requiring stable electricity transmission. The website content and structure support a professional image aligned with regulatory compliance and corporate responsibility. Partnerships and related domains indicate integration within the broader SSEN ecosystem. Growth indicators include emphasis on innovation and sustainability. The company maintains a clear digital presence with compliance to privacy and cookie regulations, supporting customer trust and regulatory adherence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and integration of cookie consent tools compliant with GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of a publicly accessible security policy or incident response page limits transparency. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file was found, which could enhance responsible vulnerability management. The presence of a data protection officer contact indicates GDPR awareness. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by publishing explicit security governance documents and incident response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Enhance visibility and accessibility of data protection officer contact details across the website.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Continue to monitor and improve accessibility and mobile optimization to maintain high user experience standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Scottish and Southern Electricity Networks Transmission Limited
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SSEN Transmission
Description
SSEN Transmission’s innovation purpose is to deliver a reliable and resilient network safer, smarter, greener, and faster.
Key services
Electricity transmission network operation, Network innovation and resilience, Infrastructure development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Azure Application Insights, ReciteMe accessibility tool, OneTrust cookie consent
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Azure Application Insights, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Azure Application Insights
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and maintained by a major UK energy transmission company.
  2. Strong privacy and cookie compliance with OneTrust integration.
  3. Use of modern analytics and accessibility tools.
  4. No security blocking or WAF challenges detected.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable due to subdomain status, not a registered domain.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response page found.
  7. Contact information and data protection officer details are present but could be more prominent.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Episerver CMS, Google Tag Manager for marketing and analytics, Microsoft Azure Application Insights for telemetry, and OneTrust for privacy compliance. Hosting appears to be on Microsoft Azure, providing scalable and secure infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and accessibility features. The site uses modern HTML5 and CSS with deferred script loading to optimize load times. Technical debt appears low, but continuous monitoring of third-party dependencies is recommended. SEO is well addressed with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and secure online presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ssen-transmission.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ssen-transmission.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.