Skip to main content

Security report for srovnator.cz

PFP s.r.o. · Finance · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Srovnator.cz is a Czech online insurance comparison platform operated by PFP s.r.o., a subsidiary of the major Czech brokerage company Renomia. The website offers comprehensive comparison services for vehicle mandatory insurance, comprehensive vehicle insurance, travel insurance, and property insurance. It targets Czech consumers seeking transparent and competitive insurance offers. The platform emphasizes customer-centric service, independence from insurers, and ease of use with online calculators and quick contract processing. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern frameworks like Bootstrap and uses advanced analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and PostHog. It demonstrates strong digital maturity with excellent mobile optimization, SEO, and user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is robust, with clear GDPR policies and cookie consent mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data slightly reduces trust but is mitigated by regulatory registration and transparent business information. Overall, Srovnator.cz is a professional, trustworthy, and well-structured platform in the Czech insurance market.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of srovnator.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching srovnator.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
95
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention srovnator.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for srovnator.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the finance sector, specifically in insurance brokerage and comparison. It leverages its parent company Renomia's market presence to offer a broad portfolio of insurance products from multiple insurers. The business model focuses on online lead generation and brokerage commissions by providing transparent price and coverage comparisons. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its independence, comprehensive offer analysis beyond price, and customer support availability including phone and chat. The site shows strong customer engagement with verified reviews and a large user base. Strategic partnerships with insurers and related services like electronic green card management enhance its ecosystem. Growth potential is supported by digital marketing and continuous customer care. The company maintains a medium size profile with a focus on the Czech market.

Security posture

The website maintains a good security posture with mandatory HTTPS, secure form submissions with nonce tokens, and GDPR compliance. It uses modern analytics and tracking tools responsibly with cookie consent. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not clearly present and should be implemented to enhance protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which is a gap in transparency. Overall, the site is secure for users but could improve by publishing security policies and enhancing HTTP headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  4. Enhance transparency by providing data retention policies and detailed privacy notices.
  5. Consider obtaining and displaying additional certifications or trust seals to further boost user confidence.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
PFP s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PFP s.r.o.
Description
Srovnátor.cz je online srovnávač pojištění, který provozuje firma PFP, dceřiná společnost největší české makléřské společnosti Renomia.
Key services
Povinné ručení (mandatory vehicle insurance), Havarijní pojištění (comprehensive vehicle insurance), Cestovní pojištění (travel insurance), Pojištění majetku (property insurance)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.0, Bootstrap 5, PostHog analytics, Google Tag Manager, Bing Ads tracking, Cookie Script, WP Rocket (performance optimization), WordPress CMS
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with nonce tokens
  • GDPR compliance indicated

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, PostHog
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics via GTM, PostHog
Marketing tools
Cookie Script
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional Czech insurance comparison platform
  2. No WHOIS data available, possibly due to registry restrictions or privacy
  3. Strong GDPR and privacy compliance indications
  4. Multiple verified customer reviews displayed
  5. Uses modern web technologies and analytics
  6. No security blocking or WAF detected
  7. Clear contact information and company details provided
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for client-side scripting. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, PostHog, and Bing Ads tracking. Performance optimizations are handled by WP Rocket plugin with lazy loading and prefetching techniques. The site is mobile-optimized with excellent accessibility and SEO practices including structured data (JSON-LD) and Open Graph metadata. No hosting provider details were found in the content. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting a fast and user-friendly experience. Potential risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing security monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 69/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with srovnator.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review srovnator.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.