Skip to main content

Security report for srovnam.cz

srovnám.cz · Energy · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

srovnám.cz is a Czech language website focused on providing consumers with guidance and comparison tools for electricity and gas prices. Established in 2008, it serves as an informational portal helping users understand contract types, pricing models, and customer service considerations when selecting energy suppliers. The site targets Czech consumers seeking to optimize their energy expenses and make informed decisions. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and cookie consent management. The design is professional and mobile-optimized, with good SEO practices. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied and cookie consent implemented, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. No contact emails or phone numbers are provided, which limits direct user engagement and trust signals. Overall, the site is trustworthy and functional but could improve transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching srovnam.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
85
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche in the Czech energy market as a specialized price comparison and advisory platform. Its competitive advantage lies in clear, consumer-focused content explaining complex energy contract terms and pricing. The business model appears to be informational, possibly monetized through affiliate links or advertising, though no explicit monetization is visible. The target customers are residential energy consumers in the Czech Republic. The site has maintained a stable presence since 2008, indicating sustained relevance. No partnerships or subsidiaries are disclosed. The lack of direct contact information and social media presence suggests a lean operation focused on content delivery rather than customer service. Growth potential exists through expanded services or integration with energy providers.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is used for external resources and presumably the site itself, but no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, indicating GDPR awareness. However, there is no published security policy or incident response information, which limits transparency and preparedness signals. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. The absence of contact channels for security incidents is a gap. Overall, the site is low risk but would benefit from enhanced security documentation and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to increase transparency and user trust.
  3. Add explicit contact information including emails or phone numbers for general inquiries and security incidents.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding a terms of service page to clarify user rights and obligations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
srovnám.cz
Description
Poskytuje doporučení spotřebitelům pro orientaci ve světě energetiky, zejména srovnání cen elektřiny a plynu a rady pro výběr dodavatele energií.
Key services
srovnání cen elektřiny, srovnání cen plynu, poradenství o smlouvách a dodavatelích energií
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Google Fonts, HTML5, CSS3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by external scripts loaded over HTTPS
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot session tracker
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website provides clear and relevant content about energy price comparison in Czech language.
  2. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on main page or footer.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with visible user control.
  4. No terms of service page found.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. No social media links detected.
  7. Website uses Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and consent management.
  8. No CMS detected; likely custom or static site.
  9. No visible forms for user data collection on main page.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a straightforward technology stack with HTML5, CSS3, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for cookie consent and analytics. No CMS or complex frameworks were detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO meta tags are properly set. There is room for improvement in accessibility and security headers. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for an informational site but could be modernized with enhanced security and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with srovnam.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review srovnam.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.