Skip to main content

Security report for src.ee

SRC Group · Energy · Estonia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SRC Group is a specialized marine and offshore engineering company focusing on retrofit engineering modifications including steel works, pipe works, mechanical and electrical installations, and interior refits. The company targets clients in the marine and offshore sectors, positioning itself as a niche service provider with solid references. The website reflects a small-sized business founded in 2010, with consistent branding and good content quality. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies and a custom CMS, hosted likely by Elkdata OÜ, an Estonian hosting provider. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility could be improved. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but no visible security headers or policies published. Privacy compliance is good with a cookie consent mechanism and a privacy policy page. However, contact information and terms of service are not present in the analyzed content, limiting direct communication channels and legal transparency. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, indicating legitimacy and stability.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching src.ee

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SRC Group operates in the energy and transportation sectors, specifically marine and offshore engineering retrofit services. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on engineering modifications and installations. The company appears to have a stable market position with a history dating back to 2010. There is no evidence of parent or subsidiary companies. The lack of visible contact details and social media presence suggests a controlled, possibly B2B-focused client engagement strategy. The partnership ecosystem is not evident from the website content. The company leverages a custom CMS and modern frontend technologies, indicating some investment in digital infrastructure.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture. HTTPS is presumably enabled, but no security headers were detected in the provided data. There is a cookie consent banner indicating GDPR awareness. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are published. No signs of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found. The absence of contact information for security or abuse reporting is a gap. Overall, the security maturity is basic with room for improvement in policy transparency and technical security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add terms of service and a vulnerability disclosure policy to establish clear legal and security communication channels.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.
  5. Conduct a security audit of SSL/TLS configuration and update to current best practices to ensure strong encryption.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SRC Group
Description
Marine & Offshore engineering experts with solid references in steel works, pipe works, mechanical installations, electrical installations and interior refits.
Key services
steel works, pipe works, mechanical installations, electrical installations, interior refits
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts (Rajdhani), Video element
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner with accept/manage options

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and GDPR compliant
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on homepage HTML
  4. No terms of service or security policy documents detected
  5. WHOIS data shows domain is over 13 years old, registered with a known Estonian registrar
  6. Website uses custom CMS with modern frontend technologies
  7. No analytics or advertising scripts detected in provided HTML
  8. No social media links or contact forms found in the HTML content
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom CMS with modern frontend technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and Google Fonts. The presence of video elements and responsive design indicates a focus on user experience. Hosting appears to be managed by Elkdata OÜ, a known Estonian provider. Performance is moderate with no critical errors detected. SEO is supported by appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. However, no analytics or advertising scripts were detected, suggesting minimal tracking or marketing automation. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. The technical stack is modern but lacks visible security enhancements such as HTTP security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with src.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review src.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.