Skip to main content

Security report for squadhour.lv

SIA “TEIKUMS JT” · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SQUAD Hour is a Latvian fitness club pioneering design-oriented and technology-enhanced fitness experiences in the Baltic region. The company offers a variety of fitness programs including PRAMA interactive training, boxing, cross training, and high-intensity interval training, targeting fitness enthusiasts seeking innovative workout options. The website is built on WordPress and integrates modern analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and provides clear business and contact information, supporting a trustworthy online presence. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, but lacks some security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating room for improvement in compliance and security best practices. Overall, the business appears legitimate and professionally presented, with a solid foundation for growth and enhanced security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching squadhour.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the hospitality sector focusing on fitness and wellness services. It holds a small business profile with a clear market position as a design and technology-driven fitness club in Latvia. Revenue streams likely derive from memberships and training sessions. The presence of a client portal managed via a partner domain indicates integration with third-party service providers for operational efficiency. The company maintains active social media channels, enhancing customer engagement and brand visibility. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, suggesting independent operation. The business model is straightforward, targeting local and regional fitness consumers with innovative offerings.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses reputable analytics and marketing scripts loaded asynchronously to reduce performance impact. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could hinder timely handling of security issues. The lack of a cookie consent mechanism may expose the company to GDPR compliance risks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but would benefit from implementing additional security controls and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish an incident response policy and provide a dedicated security contact email to improve security readiness and trust.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain performance.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to broaden user inclusivity and comply with accessibility standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA “TEIKUMS JT”
VAT number
LV40203653629
Registration number
40203653629
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA “TEIKUMS JT”
Description
SQUAD Hour is the first design sports club in the Baltic states combining multiple fitness concepts and offering PRAMA Push&Play training sessions.
Key services
PRAMA interactive functional training, Boxing training, Cross Training, High Intensity Interval Training (HiiT), SYNRGY functional training, Stretching sessions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.2, FontAwesome 5.7.2, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google Maps API
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL and modern tracking technologies.
  4. Privacy policy and terms of service are published and accessible.
  5. No cookie consent mechanism detected, which may impact GDPR compliance.
  6. Contact information is clearly presented including email, phone, and physical address.
  7. Business operates in the hospitality/fitness sector in Latvia.
  8. No security headers detected; opportunity for security posture improvement.
  9. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response information found.
  10. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.2, utilizing common libraries such as FontAwesome for icons and Google services for analytics and tag management. The site loads asynchronously many scripts to optimize performance. The presence of Google Maps API indicates integration of location services. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and uses caching and minified CSS/JS for performance. However, no explicit hosting provider information was found. The technical implementation is solid but could be improved by adding security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. Accessibility is basic, and SEO optimization is good with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with squadhour.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review squadhour.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.