Skip to main content

Security report for spoonful.net.au

Spoonful Pty Ltd · Hospitality · Australia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

32/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Spoonful Pty Ltd operates a catering service in Australia, specializing in events ranging from intimate dinner parties to extravagant weddings. The website presents a basic but professional digital presence, primarily built on the Webflow platform, with integrated Google Analytics and Tag Manager for visitor tracking. The business targets individuals and organizations seeking catering services, positioning itself as a local hospitality provider with a small business scale. The content is minimal, indicating a forthcoming website update, but includes essential contact methods such as email and a catering enquiry form. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, jQuery, and asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. The site appears mobile-optimized with good navigation and design quality. However, there is a lack of advanced SEO and accessibility features, and performance is moderate. Security practices include HTTPS usage and reCAPTCHA v3 on forms, but no explicit security headers or incident response information are present. From a security perspective, the site shows moderate maturity with some best practices but lacks comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The absence of these elements reduces privacy compliance and security posture scores. No critical vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected, but improvements are needed to enhance trust and compliance. Overall, the website is functional and professional but basic in content and security maturity. Strategic enhancements in privacy compliance, security headers, and incident response transparency would improve the risk profile and user trust significantly.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching spoonful.net.au

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
32

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Spoonful Pty Ltd operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on catering services for various event types. The business model is service-oriented, targeting event organizers and private clients in Australia. The company maintains a modest digital footprint with a Webflow-based website and social media presence on Instagram. Revenue streams likely derive from catering contracts and event services. The lack of detailed business information such as founding year or company size suggests a small-scale operation. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The company’s competitive advantage lies in personalized catering for diverse occasions. Growth indicators are limited due to minimal online content, but the planned website update may signal expansion or rebranding efforts.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and form protection via reCAPTCHA v3. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No privacy or cookie policies are published, which is a compliance gap under GDPR and similar regulations. Incident response readiness is unclear due to lack of contact channels for security issues. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The use of Google Analytics without IP anonymization raises privacy concerns. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance site security.
  3. Enable IP anonymization in Google Analytics to reduce privacy risks.
  4. Add incident response contact information and consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  5. Ensure HTTPS is enforced site-wide and regularly audit third-party scripts for vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Spoonful Pty Ltd
Description
We cater for all occasions, from intimate dinner parties to extravagant weddings.
Key services
Catering for intimate dinner parties, Catering for extravagant weddings, Takeaway food services
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, jQuery 3.5.1, Webflow CMS, UseBasin form handling
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URLs)
  • Google Analytics configured with anonymize_ip false
  • Form submission protected by reCAPTCHA v3

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the website.
  2. Contact information is limited to an email address and a contact form; no phone number or physical address provided.
  3. Website uses modern Webflow CMS and includes Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking.
  4. No explicit security headers or incident response contacts found.
  5. Website content is minimal and primarily focused on catering services with a note about a new website coming soon.
  6. Social media presence limited to Instagram link.
  7. No evidence of certifications or compliance frameworks.
  8. Form includes reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection.
  9. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow platform, utilizing jQuery 3.5.1 and Google Analytics/Tag Manager for tracking. The use of asynchronous script loading improves performance. The site includes a responsive design with mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. However, SEO optimization is limited to basic meta tags without structured data like JSON-LD. The form handling is outsourced to UseBasin with reCAPTCHA v3 integration for spam prevention. Hosting appears to be via Webflow’s infrastructure. There is no evidence of advanced caching or CDN usage beyond Webflow defaults. Technical debt is low but modernization opportunities include adding structured data, improving accessibility, and enhancing security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with spoonful.net.au. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review spoonful.net.au.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.