Skip to main content

Security report for spolana.cz

Spolana · Energy · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Spolana is a Czech chemical company operating primarily in the energy and chemical manufacturing sector. The website presents a professional corporate presence with detailed cookie consent management and a comprehensive privacy policy, indicating a commitment to GDPR compliance. The site is built on Microsoft SharePoint and uses common web technologies such as jQuery and Bootstrap, with analytics managed via Google Analytics and consent via Cookiebot. Despite the lack of WHOIS data, the website content and external links suggest a legitimate and established business, likely part of the Unipetrol corporate group. Security posture is moderate, with room for improvement in security headers and explicit security policies. Overall, the site is accessible, well-structured, and suitable for its industrial target audience.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of spolana.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching spolana.cz

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention spolana.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
3
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
3
Weak passwords
33%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for spolana.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Spolana holds a significant position in the Czech chemical industry, serving industrial clients with chemical products and services. The business model focuses on manufacturing and industrial chemical production, supported by a digital presence integrated with its parent or partner companies such as Unipetrol and Orlen. The website's external links and references indicate a strong partnership ecosystem within the energy sector. The absence of direct contact information on the main page suggests a focus on B2B interactions through other channels. The company demonstrates compliance with privacy regulations and uses modern consent management tools, reflecting a mature approach to data privacy and user trust.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates a robust cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot, supporting GDPR compliance. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no visible incident response or security policy publicly available, which may limit transparency for security inquiries. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Cookiebot is managed with user consent, reducing privacy risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but would benefit from enhanced header configurations, public security policies, and incident response contact information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  4. Improve SEO metadata including Open Graph and structured data for better search visibility.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities and update them accordingly.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Spolana
Description
Spolana is a chemical company operating in the energy and chemical manufacturing sector, providing chemical products and services.
Key services
Chemical manufacturing, Industrial chemical products
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, SharePoint, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Bootstrap
Frameworks
SharePoint
Platforms
Microsoft SharePoint
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or registry restrictions.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed cookie categories and opt-in mechanism.
  4. Website uses SharePoint CMS and common web technologies like jQuery and Bootstrap.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  6. Privacy policy is comprehensive and GDPR compliant.
  7. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages detected.
  8. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  9. Website content is professional and targeted to industrial/energy sector audience.
  10. Multiple external links to related corporate and partner domains detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Microsoft SharePoint, leveraging jQuery, Bootstrap, and Cookiebot for UI and consent management. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are used for tracking and analytics. The site shows moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, the lack of visible security headers and limited SEO metadata indicate areas for technical improvement. The site structure is clear and navigation is user-friendly, but accessibility could be enhanced. Hosting details are not explicitly available, and WHOIS data is missing, possibly due to privacy protection or registry restrictions.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with spolana.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review spolana.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.