Skip to main content

Security report for spoedpostnoordlimburg.nl

Spoedpost Noord-Limburg · Healthcare · Netherlands

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website huisartsenpoedpostnoordlimburg.nl represents a newly established healthcare emergency service provider in the Noord-Limburg region of the Netherlands. It offers out-of-hours general practitioner emergency care, crisis services, pharmacy services, and collaborates with the local emergency department. The site targets patients requiring urgent medical attention and provides relevant information, contact details, and educational resources. The business is positioned regionally and is affiliated with VieCuri, a known healthcare organization. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and integrations such as Google Tag Manager and embedded Vimeo videos. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, providing a good user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security headers and explicit incident response policies are missing. Privacy compliance is basic with privacy and cookie policies present but lacking a consent mechanism. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business purpose and launch timeline, supporting legitimacy. The website is safe, professional, and trustworthy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching spoedpostnoordlimburg.nl

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
70
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
73
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the healthcare sector, specifically providing urgent general practitioner services in a defined geographic region. Its business model is service-oriented, focusing on patient care rather than commercial sales. The website supports patient engagement through educational content and clear contact information. Partnerships with trusted healthcare information platforms like thuisarts.nl and moetiknaardedokter.nl enhance its credibility and ecosystem. The company is relatively new, founded in 2024, and leverages digital tools for patient interaction and information dissemination. The presence of multiple language options indicates an inclusive approach to serve a diverse population. The business appears to be medium-sized with a regional focus and a clear affiliation to a parent healthcare organization, VieCuri.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS and no exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, which could be a gap in compliance and readiness. The use of third-party scripts and embedded content is managed without obvious vulnerabilities. Privacy policies are present and GDPR compliant, but cookie consent mechanisms are missing, which may pose compliance risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but would benefit from enhanced technical controls and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply fully with GDPR cookie requirements.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Spoedpost Noord-Limburg
Description
Binnen de Spoedpost Noord-Limburg werken de huisartsenspoedpost, crisisdienst, dienstapotheek en spoedeisende hulp (SEH) van VieCuri onder één dak samen aan de organisatie van spoedzorg in Noord-Limburg.
Key services
Huisartsenspoedpost (GP emergency post), Crisisdienst (crisis service), Dienstapotheek (pharmacy service), Spoedeisende hulp (emergency department) collaboration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, jQuery, Vimeo embed, Google Tag Manager, Mindd Widget, LiteSpeed LazyLoad
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Mindd Widget
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on healthcare emergency services in Noord-Limburg, Netherlands.
  3. Website uses WordPress CMS with modern plugins and embeds.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present but cookie consent mechanism is missing.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  6. Domain is very new but consistent with business launch.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. Good mobile and accessibility features observed.
  9. External links mostly to trusted healthcare and related service sites.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with a modern theme and plugins including Mindd Widget and LiteSpeed LazyLoad for performance optimization. It uses jQuery and embeds Vimeo videos for content delivery. Hosting appears to be on Azure Websites for some embedded services, while the main domain is registered with Superior B.V. The site is mobile responsive and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with lazy loading implemented for images. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were detected. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and implement cookie consent mechanisms to improve compliance and security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with spoedpostnoordlimburg.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review spoedpostnoordlimburg.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.