Skip to main content

Security report for spmoilandgas.com

SPM Oil & Gas · Energy · N/a

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SPM Oil & Gas is a global provider specializing in surface frac solutions for the oil and gas industry, supported by the reputable Caterpillar brand. Their website presents a professional and well-structured digital presence built on Adobe Experience Manager, featuring comprehensive product and service offerings tailored to industry professionals and customers. The technical infrastructure includes modern web technologies and compliance tools such as OneTrust for cookie consent and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage and cookie consent, but lacks visible security headers and explicit security policies. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, though the strong brand association mitigates some risk. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and targeted at a B2B industrial audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Medium

      DNSSEC Not Enabled

      DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

      What to do: Enable DNSSEC to prevent DNS spoofing attacks

      • CAPEC-142
      • RFC 4033
      • RFC 4035
  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      No DKIM record found

      DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

      What to do: Configure DKIM with your email provider

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

      Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

      What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

      Prevents MIME type sniffing

      What to do: Add "X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff"

      • CAPEC-209
      • ASVS V3.4.4
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

Keep watching spmoilandgas.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention spmoilandgas.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
14
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
14
Weak passwords
7%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for spmoilandgas.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the energy sector, focusing on oilfield surface frac solutions and related services such as aftermarket support and equipment rental. Backed by Caterpillar, SPM Oil & Gas leverages a strong market position and brand trust. Their business model is B2B, targeting support personnel, existing customers, and sales prospects. The website content and navigation support a comprehensive product catalog and service portfolio, indicating a mature business with global reach. Partnerships with Caterpillar and related domains reinforce their ecosystem. However, the lack of publicly available contact information and privacy policies on the site may limit customer engagement and trust.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates a cookie consent mechanism, indicating baseline security and privacy awareness. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are provided, which could hinder timely security communication. The missing WHOIS data is a notable gap in domain transparency. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and ensuring domain registration transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS registration information to improve domain transparency and trustworthiness.
  5. Add clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve customer trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SPM Oil & Gas
Description
SPM™ Oil & Gas is a global provider of surface frac solutions, bringing you quality products that keep the oilfield moving. Backed by the power of Caterpillar, SPM Oil & Gas is set to improve the lives of those in the communities where we work.
Key services
surface frac solutions, drilling products, well service products, production products, aftermarket services, frac rental, surface control rental, safety programs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), OneTrust Cookie Consent, Google Tag Manager, Google Maps API, JavaScript, CSS3, HTML5
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URL https://)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses Adobe Experience Manager CMS.
  2. Strong branding association with Caterpillar.
  3. Cookie consent implemented via OneTrust.
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on homepage HTML snippet.
  5. No privacy policy or terms of service explicitly found in provided content.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy blocking.
  7. Google Tag Manager used for analytics and tracking.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  9. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, a robust enterprise CMS, and uses modern web standards including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. Integration with OneTrust and Google Tag Manager indicates attention to privacy and analytics. The site appears mobile-optimized with good accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through optimization. The technical stack is enterprise-grade but lacks visible advanced security configurations. Hosting provider details are not evident from the data. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional digital presence but could benefit from enhanced security and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with spmoilandgas.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review spmoilandgas.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.