Skip to main content

Security report for spitfiregirldesign.com

SPITFIREGIRL, LLC · Hospitality · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Spitfiregirl is a specialized creative agency offering modern branding, web design, and digital marketing services primarily targeting fashion, hospitality, lifestyle brands, authors, and female founders. Established since 2000, the company positions itself as a premium partner for changemakers and go-getters, emphasizing strategic branding and custom web solutions. The website reflects a high level of professionalism with excellent design quality and consistent branding. Technically, the site leverages the Showit platform with modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Hotjar, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, though some security headers are missing and no explicit incident response contacts are provided. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms, which could pose regulatory risks. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-positioned in its market segment but should improve privacy and security disclosures to enhance compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching spitfiregirldesign.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a small-sized creative agency with a focus on strategic branding and web design for niche sectors including hospitality, fashion, and authorship. Its business model revolves around providing bespoke creative services such as VIP days, art direction, print and packaging, and e-commerce site design. The company holds certifications like WOSB and WBE, enhancing its credibility. The target audience includes female founders, wedding professionals, and lifestyle brands seeking elevated brand presence. The agency maintains a strong portfolio and client testimonials, reinforcing its market position. Partnerships with platforms like Dubsado for appointment scheduling indicate integration with modern business tools. The absence of explicit contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled client engagement via forms and scheduled calls.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive information. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present, and incident response contacts are not provided, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The use of third-party analytics and tracking tools without visible consent mechanisms raises privacy concerns under GDPR and similar regulations. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, with room for improvement in policy disclosures and header configurations to align with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Create a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Provide clear incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct audits to improve inclusivity and compliance with accessibility standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SPITFIREGIRL, LLC
Description
Spitfiregirl is an award-winning creative agency for Changemakers, Groundbreakers and go-getters ready to take the next step. Strategic branding and custom web design studio passionate about client visions.
Key services
Branding, Custom Website Design, Digital Marketing, Art Direction, Print + Packaging, Strategy, E-Commerce Site Design, VIP Days
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Showit platform scripts
Platforms
Showit
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Hotjar for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Metricool
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Metricool
Marketing tools
Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed creative agency site focused on branding and web design.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  3. Contact is primarily via contact form; no explicit email or phone found.
  4. Use of modern analytics and tracking tools without explicit user consent mechanisms.
  5. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page.
  6. Strong branding consistency and client testimonials enhance trust.
  7. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Showit platform, utilizing jQuery 3.5.1 and modern analytics tools like Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Hotjar. The site loads static assets from Showit's CDN, ensuring reliable content delivery. The HTML and CSS are valid and well-structured, supporting responsive design for mobile and desktop. Performance is moderate, with potential optimization opportunities in asset loading and script management. SEO is supported by proper meta tags including description and Open Graph image tags. Accessibility is basic, with scope for improvement in semantic markup and ARIA attributes. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with spitfiregirldesign.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review spitfiregirldesign.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.