Skip to main content

Security report for spitex-lar.ch

Spitex Limmat Aare Reuss AG · Healthcare · Switzerland

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Spitex Limmat Aare Reuss AG is a Swiss healthcare provider specializing in outpatient nursing and care services. The company emphasizes professional, high-quality care with a strong focus on collaboration with healthcare professionals and families. Their services include somatic and psychiatric nursing, wound and stoma care, palliative care, dementia care, household services, and additional comfort services. They also invest in education and training, positioning themselves as a regional leader in outpatient care. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern analytics and security tools such as Google reCAPTCHA and Plausible Analytics. The site is well-optimized for mobile and SEO, with clear navigation and professional design. Security posture is good with HTTPS and form protections, though some security headers and policies could be improved. Privacy compliance is strong with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the website reflects a trustworthy and professional healthcare organization with a solid digital presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching spitex-lar.ch

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
53
Average
52
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the healthcare sector, targeting individuals needing outpatient care, healthcare professionals, and job seekers. Their business model is service-oriented, focusing on nursing and care services with additional educational offerings. The organization maintains a consistent brand and strong trust indicators such as social media engagement and transparent contact information. They leverage partnerships with platforms like OPAN for service registration. The market position is stable and regionally focused, with no signs of suspicious activity or privacy protection misuse. Growth is supported by active recruitment and training programs.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, and a cookie consent mechanism. However, it lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and security.txt files, which are recommended best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a minor gap. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing formal security policies and improving HTTP headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Add security-related HTTP headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Regularly review and update privacy and cookie policies to maintain GDPR compliance.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance with standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Spitex Limmat Aare Reuss AG
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Spitex Limmat Aare Reuss AG
Description
Spitex LAR provides professional outpatient nursing and care services focusing on high-quality care for clients, collaborating closely with relatives, doctors, and health and social professionals. They emphasize specialized nursing, psychiatry, and household services, and invest in education and training.
Key services
Somatic Nursing, Psychiatric Nursing, Wound and Stoma Care, Palliative Care, Dementia Care, Household Services, Additional Comfort Services, Care for Relatives, Child Spitex, Carepoint
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Plausible Analytics, WordPress
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics
Marketing tools
Plausible Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Clear and accessible contact information including phone, email, and physical address.
  3. Active social media presence on Instagram, LinkedIn, and Facebook.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  5. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  6. No visible security policy or incident response contact details.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using modern technologies including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, and Plausible Analytics. The site uses Typekit fonts and optimized images for performance. The design is responsive and mobile-friendly with good SEO practices such as meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate with room for optimization. No critical technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and secure online presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with spitex-lar.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review spitex-lar.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.