Skip to main content

Security report for spicumeistari.lv

Spicu Meistari · Energy · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Spicu Meistari is a Latvian small business specializing in water supply solutions including well drilling, installation of water pumps, and water filtration systems. With over 15 years of experience and more than 5000 completed projects, the company positions itself as a trusted local expert in the energy sector focused on water infrastructure. The website is professionally designed using WordPress CMS and incorporates modern web technologies such as Bootstrap and jQuery, along with Google Analytics and Tag Manager for user tracking and performance monitoring. The presence of a cookie consent banner with granular controls indicates good GDPR compliance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, but lacks some advanced security headers and formal incident response disclosures. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and trustworthy with room for improvement in security and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching spicumeistari.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
55
Email security
65
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the energy sector, specifically water supply and well drilling services, targeting residential and commercial customers in Latvia. Its business model is service-oriented with a focus on quality and reliability, supported by trust indicators such as a warranty certificate and extensive project experience. The website content is consistent and well-branded, supporting a strong market position locally. The partnership with a web development firm (grandem.lv) suggests a professional digital presence. No direct revenue streams or parent/subsidiary relationships are evident. The company leverages digital marketing tools and analytics to optimize customer engagement and service delivery.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements, demonstrating a baseline security and privacy posture. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No publicly available security or incident response policies were found, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The lack of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts domain trust verification. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with recommendations to enhance header configurations and publish formal security policies to improve resilience and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and responsible disclosure.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Seek to resolve WHOIS data availability issues to improve domain trust and legitimacy verification.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Spicu Meistari
Description
Piedāvā profesionālu spices ierīkošanu, dziļurbumus, ūdensfiltru uzstādīšanu, spiču un dziļurbumu aprīkošanu ar vairāk nekā 15 gadu pieredzi un 5000+ veiksmīgiem projektiem Latvijā.
Key services
Spices ierīkošana, Dziļurbumu izveide, Spiču un dziļurbumu aprīkošana, Ūdens filtri, Dziļurbumu tīrīšana
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 4.1.3, Fancyapps Fancybox 5.0.36, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, WhatsHelp widget
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Marketing tools
WhatsHelp widget
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is in Latvian with professional presentation and clear service offerings.
  3. Multiple Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager scripts indicate extensive analytics usage.
  4. Cookie consent banner is implemented with granular user controls, indicating GDPR compliance.
  5. No email addresses found explicitly in HTML content; phone number is clearly presented.
  6. No security.txt or incident response information found.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  8. Website uses WordPress CMS with common libraries and frameworks.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with Bootstrap 4.1.3 and jQuery 3.7.1, providing a responsive and modern user interface. It uses Fancyapps Fancybox for media display and integrates multiple Google Analytics and Tag Manager scripts for tracking and marketing. The site loads external resources from reputable CDNs and uses a WhatsHelp widget for communication. Performance is moderate with some caching and optimization evident. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data. No major technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected, but security header implementation is lacking.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with spicumeistari.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review spicumeistari.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.