Skip to main content

Security report for specialnistavbymost.cz

Speciální stavby Most spol. s r.o. · Energy · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Speciální stavby Most spol. s r.o. is a Czech company specializing in large-scale demolition, industrial construction, and steel structure assembly, operating since 1991. The company serves industrial clients, particularly in the energy and manufacturing sectors, offering services such as demolition of reinforced concrete and steel structures, bridge constructions, and dismantling of power plant boilers. It maintains certified management systems for quality, environment, and occupational health and safety, demonstrating a commitment to compliance and operational excellence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with common plugins and shows moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and GDPR compliance, though security headers are lacking and WHOIS data is missing, which impacts domain trustworthiness. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, but domain registration information should be verified for full legitimacy assurance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of specialnistavbymost.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching specialnistavbymost.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a medium market position with over 30 years of experience and a workforce of approximately 175 employees including subsidiaries. Its business model focuses on providing specialized construction and demolition services to industrial clients, particularly in energy and manufacturing. Revenue is estimated between 500-700 million CZK annually. The company demonstrates strong compliance with international standards (ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 45001) and GDPR, indicating mature operational processes. The website reflects a consistent brand and provides detailed service and company information, targeting industrial and energy sector clients. No evident partnerships or related domains were identified beyond the web hosting/design provider.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism, reflecting good privacy practices. The presence of ISO certifications for quality, environment, and occupational health and safety further supports a strong security and compliance culture. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that should be addressed. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, and no security.txt file is detected. The lack of WHOIS data reduces trust in domain legitimacy, which is a security concern. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with enhanced HTTP headers and transparency on incident response.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to enhance domain legitimacy and trust.
  3. Consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident reporting.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Speciální stavby Most spol. s r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Speciální stavby Most spol. s r.o.
Description
Company specializes in large-scale demolition, construction of industrial complexes, and steel structure assembly. Established in 1991 with extensive experience in demolition of reinforced concrete and steel structures, bridge constructions, chimneys, cooling towers, and dismantling of power plant boilers. They operate continuous shift work and maintain quality, environmental, and occupational health and safety management systems certified to ISO standards.
Key services
Large-scale demolition, Construction of industrial complexes, Steel structure assembly, Demolition of power plant and heating plant boilers, Specific dismantling services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.5.5, jQuery 3.7.1, Slider WD plugin, Simple Lightbox plugin, Moove GDPR Cookie Compliance plugin, Google Fonts (Open Sans, Source Sans Pro)
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • GDPR privacy policy available
  • ISO management system certifications

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Czech language and professionally presented.
  3. Strong focus on compliance with GDPR and ISO standards.
  4. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond GDPR cookie compliance.
  6. WHOIS data is missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.5.5, using jQuery and plugins such as Slider WD, Simple Lightbox, and Moove GDPR Cookie Compliance. It uses Google Fonts for typography. The site is moderately performant with good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic with proper meta tags but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Hosting provider is not identified from the data. The site uses a slider for images and has a cookie consent banner implemented. No analytics or tracking scripts beyond GDPR compliance are detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 60/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with specialnistavbymost.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review specialnistavbymost.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.