Skip to main content

Security report for spariga.lv

SPA Riga · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SPA Riga is a small hospitality business offering day spa services in the center of Riga, Latvia. The website provides detailed information about their spa facilities including multiple types of saunas, pools, jacuzzi, and a relaxation room. The business model focuses on individual and group reservations without requiring advance payments, targeting local customers seeking wellness and relaxation experiences. The site is professionally designed with good navigation and mobile optimization, using modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools such as Google Analytics and Tag Manager. Privacy compliance is addressed with a cookie consent banner and a privacy policy page, though terms of service and security policies are not present. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage but lacks explicit security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration trust verification. Overall, the website is functional, trustworthy for its business type, and compliant with basic privacy requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching spariga.lv

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
95
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SPA Riga operates in the hospitality sector, specifically in wellness and spa services. The company targets local residents and visitors in Riga looking for private spa experiences. Their competitive advantage lies in offering multiple sauna types and facilities for small groups or families with flexible booking options. Revenue streams are primarily from spa complex rentals and special events like children's spa parties. The website indicates a small business size with no parent or subsidiary companies mentioned. Partnerships appear limited to the website developer Esteriol. Growth indicators include active online booking and social media presence. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance trust by publishing terms of service, security policies, and WHOIS transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enabled, and cookie consent is implemented, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are provided, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The use of third-party libraries requires regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or credentials were detected in the HTML content. Compliance with GDPR is basic but could be improved with clearer data retention policies and DPO contact information. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small hospitality business but could benefit from enhancements to align with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish terms of service and a detailed security policy to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly update all third-party libraries and frameworks to their latest secure versions.
  5. Provide contact information for a data protection officer or privacy contact to enhance GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SPA Riga
Description
SPA Riga offers day spa services in the center of Riga, providing individual reservations for relaxation in a family or friends setting. Facilities include multiple saunas, pools, jacuzzi, and a relaxation room for up to 15 people. Reservations do not require advance payment or credit card details.
Key services
Spa complex rental, Saunas (classic, steam, Latvian, Turkish), Pools (including cold water pool), Jacuzzi, Relaxation room, Children's spa parties
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Slick Carousel, AOS (Animate On Scroll), SweetAlert2, Remodal, jQuery DateTimePicker, FancyBox, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, FontAwesome
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by https URL)
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. Site uses multiple modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools.
  4. Cookie consent banner and privacy policy present indicating basic GDPR compliance.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided including phone and physical address.
  6. No terms of service or explicit security policy found.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  8. No data protection officer contact found.
  9. Site content is relevant and professionally presented for a small hospitality business.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end technology stack including jQuery, Slick Carousel, AOS for animations, SweetAlert2 for alerts, Remodal for modals, FancyBox for media display, and jQuery DateTimePicker for date selection. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for tracking and marketing purposes. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization by reducing external dependencies and improving caching. Accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. SEO optimization is minimal with some meta tags present but lacking comprehensive keywords and descriptions. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but has room for modernization and performance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with spariga.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review spariga.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.