Skip to main content

Security report for soulgood.nl

Soulgood · Media · Netherlands

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and Network security.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Soulgood is a creative agency based in Uden, Netherlands, specializing in design, video and animation, web marketing, and strategic copywriting services. Established since 2009, the company positions itself as a creative collective focused on helping businesses grow their identity and communication with soul and vision. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with excellent content quality and user experience. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern tools such as Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, and PixelYourSite for marketing and analytics. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though security headers are not detected and could be improved. Privacy compliance is strong with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie management. Overall, the website is trustworthy and well-maintained, serving a business audience seeking creative agency services.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching soulgood.nl

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
95
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Soulgood operates in the media sector as a small-sized creative agency with a clear focus on identity, design, and communication strategy. Their business model revolves around providing tailored creative solutions including branding, video production, web marketing, and strategic copywriting. The company targets businesses and organizations looking for professional creative services. The domain age and WHOIS data support the legitimacy and established nature of the business. Social media presence across Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Vimeo, and YouTube indicates active engagement and marketing efforts. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The company leverages modern digital marketing and analytics tools to optimize client campaigns and website performance.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS ensuring encrypted communication. Cookie consent is managed via the Complianz GDPR plugin, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. Tracking pixels from Facebook and Google Analytics are implemented with consent mechanisms. However, no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No security or incident response policies are published on the site, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is found. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries are apparent in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended HTTP security headers and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response information to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate risks from outdated software.
  5. Continue maintaining GDPR compliance and transparent cookie consent mechanisms to build user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Soulgood
Description
Creatief bureau in Uden. Wij steken onze koppen bij elkaar zodat jouw huisstijl, content en communicatie met je meegroeien vanuit de juiste visie en stijl.
Key services
Ontwerp & Huisstijl, Video & animatie, Web & Marketing, Strategie & copy
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, PixelYourSite, Complianz GDPR plugin, jQuery, GSAP, Vanilla LazyLoad
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Pixel
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
PixelYourSite
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional creative agency based in the Netherlands.
  2. Uses modern web technologies and WordPress CMS.
  3. Has GDPR-compliant cookie and privacy policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. No visible security headers detected; could improve security posture.
  5. Active social media presence on multiple platforms.
  6. No terms of service page found.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS version 6.8.3, utilizing popular plugins such as Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and Complianz GDPR for cookie and privacy management. The tech stack includes jQuery, GSAP for animations, Vanilla LazyLoad for image optimization, and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tags. The site loads asynchronously many scripts and uses modern fonts from Google Fonts. Performance is moderate with some deferred loading and lazy loading techniques. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and viewport meta tags. Accessibility is basic with some semantic HTML but could be improved. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, Twitter cards, and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting provider is not explicitly identified from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well implemented with room for security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with soulgood.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review soulgood.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.