Skip to main content

Security report for sorwespa.com

SÖRWESPA · Hospitality · Estonia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SÖRWESPA is a small hospitality business located in Saaremaa, Estonia, offering accommodation, spa services, authentic local cuisine, and event spaces. The website reflects a well-structured and professionally designed platform built on WordPress, with multilingual support and integrated booking links to a third-party service. The technical infrastructure includes modern web technologies and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and CookieYes for cookie consent management. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, though there is room for improvement in security headers and incident response transparency. Privacy compliance is partially addressed through cookie consent but lacks a dedicated privacy policy page. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional image suitable for its target audience of tourists seeking wellness and relaxation in Saaremaa.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sorwespa.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sorwespa.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for sorwespa.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets the hospitality and wellness tourism market in Estonia, focusing on authentic local experiences and spa relaxation. Its competitive advantage lies in its unique location and combination of lodging, spa, and local cuisine. Revenue streams likely include accommodation bookings, spa services, dining, and event hosting. The partnership ecosystem includes booking platform bouk.io and website development by edhotels.com. Growth indicators include recent domain registration and active social media presence. Strategic observations suggest focusing on enhancing privacy and security transparency to build further trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed user controls, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of security headers and lack of published security or incident response policies represent gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The business would benefit from publishing a privacy policy, security policy, and incident response contacts to improve compliance and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add incident response and vulnerability disclosure information, including a security.txt file if possible.
  4. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to identify potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Maintain and update cookie consent mechanisms to reflect evolving privacy regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SÖRWESPA
Description
SÖRWESPA is a hospitality business located at the beginning of the Sõrve peninsula in Saaremaa, Estonia, offering accommodation in private cottages, spa facilities with saunas and pools, authentic local cuisine, and seminar spaces.
Key services
Accommodation in guest apartments and holiday homes, Spa services including saunas and pools, Local cuisine restaurant, Seminar and event spaces
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, CookieYes cookie consent
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Client transfer prohibited domain status
  • Cookie consent with detailed categories

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (implied by _ga cookies)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
CookieYes
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and images.
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed categories and user controls.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and physical address.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and Tripadvisor enhances trust.
  6. Use of WordPress CMS with common plugins and Google Tag Manager for analytics.
  7. No visible security headers detected in provided data; opportunity for improvement.
  8. No forms detected on the homepage; booking links redirect to external booking platform.
  9. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  10. Website content is in Estonian with English alternate language available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a child theme and uses common plugins like Yoast SEO and CookieYes for SEO and privacy compliance. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The site is moderately performant with responsive design and mobile optimization. Hosting details are not explicit but domain registration is recent and consistent with the business age. Technical risks include lack of advanced security headers and potential for outdated plugins if not maintained. Opportunities exist to modernize security posture and improve privacy transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sorwespa.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sorwespa.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.