Skip to main content

Security report for solvians.com

WSD · Finance · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WSD is a technology company specializing in full automation solutions for structured products, serving a global clientele primarily in the financial sector. The company positions itself as a critical infrastructure provider in the structured products value chain, offering cloud-based, scalable, and resilient technology solutions. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand with strong industry partnerships and certifications such as ISO and EcoVadis. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and uses various modern JavaScript libraries and plugins, but suffers from slow load times and lacks HTTPS encryption, which is a significant security concern. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear cookie and privacy policies and consent mechanisms. However, the absence of SSL and security headers lowers the overall security posture. The company provides multiple contact channels including email, phone, and a detailed contact form, supporting good business credibility. Strategic recommendations include immediate implementation of HTTPS, enhancement of security headers, and performance optimization to improve user experience and security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching solvians.com

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention solvians.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for solvians.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

WSD operates in the finance and technology sectors, focusing on structured products automation and regulatory compliance solutions. Their business model is B2B, targeting financial institutions, issuers, and distributors of structured products. The company leverages strategic partnerships with major data providers like Morningstar, SIX, and Refinitiv, and participates in industry associations such as the German Structured Securities Association. Their offerings include data automation, cloud hosting, and operational support, positioning them as a mid-sized player with a strong reputation and trust signals. The website content and testimonials indicate a focus on innovation, client service, and operational excellence. Growth indicators include active event participation and a robust partner ecosystem. The company’s digital presence is professional but could benefit from technical improvements.

Security posture

The website currently lacks a valid SSL certificate, serving content over HTTP, which exposes users to potential interception and undermines trust. No security headers such as HSTS or Content Security Policy are implemented, and TLS protocols are not enabled, indicating a basic or poor security configuration. The site uses several third-party plugins and libraries, but no vulnerable versions or known exploits were detected in the provided data. Privacy compliance is supported by cookie consent mechanisms and policies, but the absence of HTTPS is a critical vulnerability. Incident response and security policy documents are not found on the site, which may indicate limited formal security governance publicly disclosed. Overall, the security posture is weak and requires urgent remediation to protect data integrity and user privacy.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site immediately.
  2. Configure and enforce security headers including HSTS, Content Security Policy, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Optimize website performance to reduce load times and improve user experience.
  4. Publish formal security policies and incident response procedures to enhance transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and third-party libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Elementor page builder and several plugins including Slider Revolution, Slick Carousel, and Cookie Law Info. It uses jQuery and modern JavaScript libraries for UI and UX enhancements. Hosting appears to be on AWS infrastructure based on IP addresses. The site has a large page size (~897 KB) and high resource count (363), contributing to slow load times (~11.8 seconds). Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and mobile-specific menus. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin and proper meta tags including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA roles and semantic HTML. The lack of HTTPS and security headers is a major technical risk. Overall, the technical stack is modern but requires security and performance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with solvians.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review solvians.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.