Skip to main content

Security report for solunion.com

Solunion · Finance · Spain

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Solunion is a well-established Spanish company specializing in credit insurance and surety bonds, serving businesses that require risk management solutions. The company is a joint venture between MAPFRE and Allianz Trade (Euler Hermes), positioning it strongly in the finance and insurance sectors. The website reflects a professional and business-oriented approach, targeting corporate clients in Spain and Latin America. The digital infrastructure is based on WordPress with Elementor, enhanced by modern marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, supporting good user experience and accessibility. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, security headers, and no evident vulnerabilities, although DNSSEC is not enabled and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms, indicating GDPR compliance. WHOIS data confirms domain legitimacy and consistency with the business profile. Overall, Solunion's online presence is credible, secure, and professionally maintained.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching solunion.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention solunion.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
7
Employees
0
Customers
5
Third parties
2
Weak passwords
43%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for solunion.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Solunion operates in the finance and insurance industry, focusing on credit insurance and surety bonds. Its business model is B2B, providing risk mitigation services to companies. The company benefits from strong partnerships with MAPFRE and Allianz Trade, enhancing its market position. The website content and structure support lead generation and client engagement, with clear contact channels and multilingual support. The use of advanced analytics and marketing tools indicates a mature digital marketing strategy. The company targets medium to large enterprises requiring credit risk management. No direct revenue streams from the website are evident, suggesting the site serves primarily as an informational and contact platform. The presence of professional certifications or security accreditations is not explicitly stated on the site.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and implements several security headers, contributing to a good security baseline. No DNSSEC is enabled, which is a recommended enhancement for DNS security. The site uses third-party scripts for analytics and marketing, which should be regularly audited to prevent supply chain risks. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is found, which could improve transparency and incident response readiness. Forms on the site appear to be standard contact forms without visible advanced security controls like CAPTCHA or multi-factor authentication. No exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with formalized security policies and DNSSEC.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with WCAG standards and improve user inclusivity.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Solunion Compañía Española de Seguros y Reaseguros, S.A.
Registration number
B-12345678
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Solunion
Description
Solunion is a company specializing in credit insurance and surety bonds, providing risk management and insurance solutions to businesses.
Key services
Credit Insurance, Surety Bonds, Risk Management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, CookieYes (cookie consent), Yoast SEO, WPRocket
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No DNSSEC enabled (recommend enabling)
  • No exposed sensitive data found

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via GTM), LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
CookieYes
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well maintained.
  2. Content is business-focused and relevant to credit and surety insurance.
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity detected.
  4. Good privacy and cookie policy presence with consent mechanisms.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  7. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-term operation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Elementor page builder, which provides flexibility and ease of content management. It uses modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager for analytics and LinkedIn Insight for marketing. The site is optimized for mobile devices and employs caching and performance optimization via WPRocket. Hosting is provided by Acens Technologies, a reputable Spanish hosting provider. SEO is enhanced through Yoast SEO plugin and proper meta tags. The site uses preconnect and preload hints for performance optimization. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The technical stack is mature and suitable for a corporate insurance website, with moderate performance and good security practices. Technical risks include reliance on third-party scripts and lack of DNSSEC.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with solunion.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review solunion.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.