Skip to main content

Security report for solsticewebsite.com

Retail · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.solsticewebsite.com is a Japanese language affiliate marketing site focused on recommending shampoos for women in their 40s. It provides product reviews and rankings targeting a niche audience concerned with hair care issues typical for this demographic. The business model relies on affiliate links to external product vendors, with no direct e-commerce or service offerings. Technically, the site uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with a Shift_JIS charset, and includes tracking scripts from Research Artisan Pro. The site is accessible without WAF or security challenges, but lacks advanced technical features such as security headers, privacy policies, or contact emails, which limits its security and compliance posture. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a significant concern, suggesting the domain may be unregistered or WHOIS data is withheld, which undermines trust and legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional but basic, with moderate content quality and technical implementation, but weak privacy and security compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching solsticewebsite.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site occupies a niche retail segment focused on beauty and hair care products for middle-aged women in Japan. Its competitive advantage lies in targeted content and affiliate marketing partnerships, primarily through the A8.net network. The business model is content-driven affiliate marketing, generating revenue via referral commissions. The target customers are Japanese women aged 40 and above seeking hair care solutions. The site links extensively to related beauty and health domains, indicating a broad partnership ecosystem. However, lack of transparent business information, absence of company contact details, and missing WHOIS data reduce credibility and may hinder growth or partnership opportunities. The site appears small scale with limited branding consistency and basic user experience.

Security posture

The website has HTTPS enabled, which is a positive baseline security measure. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, exposing it to potential risks like clickjacking or content injection. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating poor compliance with GDPR or similar regulations. Contact information is limited to a contact form with no direct emails or phone numbers, reducing incident response readiness. The site uses third-party tracking scripts without clear user consent mechanisms, raising privacy concerns. The absence of WHOIS data is a major red flag, suggesting potential domain legitimacy issues. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate with significant room for improvement in compliance and technical safeguards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance statements and implement user consent mechanisms for tracking.
  3. Provide verified company contact information including emails and phone numbers to improve trust and incident response capabilities.
  4. Investigate and resolve the WHOIS registration status to ensure domain legitimacy and transparency.
  5. Enhance mobile responsiveness and accessibility features to improve user experience and SEO performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website provides product recommendations and reviews focused on shampoos for women in their 40s, addressing hair and scalp concerns typical for this age group.
Key services
Product reviews, Affiliate links to shampoo products
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Research Artisan Pro
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
A8.net
Tracking pixels
Research Artisan Pro
Marketing tools
Research Artisan Pro
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. No WHOIS registration data found, domain may be unregistered or WHOIS data is hidden.
  3. Website targets Japanese-speaking women in their 40s with shampoo product recommendations.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  5. Contact information limited to a contact form; no emails or phone numbers provided.
  6. Uses affiliate marketing with links to external product sites.
  7. No social media links or company contact emails detected.
  8. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled but security posture is basic.
  9. Tracking via Research Artisan Pro script detected.
  10. Website uses Shift_JIS charset and Japanese language content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without use of modern frameworks or CMS platforms. It uses a Shift_JIS charset targeting Japanese users. The site includes affiliate marketing scripts and tracking pixels from Research Artisan Pro and A8.net. Performance appears moderate with no explicit optimization or CDN usage detected. SEO is basic with canonical tags and meta viewport but lacks advanced structured data beyond a simple breadcrumb JSON-LD. Accessibility and mobile optimization are minimal. The absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt and compliance gaps. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with solsticewebsite.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review solsticewebsite.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.