Skip to main content

Security report for solodoor.cz

Solodoor.cz · Retail · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Solodoor.cz is a Czech-based company specializing in the manufacturing and retail of interior and entrance doors, including steel and fire-resistant doors. The company operates a broad network of branded stores and contractual dealers across the Czech Republic and Slovakia, targeting residential customers and developers. Their website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides comprehensive product information and inspiration for customers. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools, supported by cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR-compliant privacy policies. Security posture is good with HTTPS and standard best practices, though some security headers could be improved. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which is common and justified for commercial entities. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional digital presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching solodoor.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
82
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
40
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention solodoor.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
5
Employees
0
Customers
5
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
100%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for solodoor.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a solid market position in the retail and manufacturing sector for doors in the Czech and Slovak markets. Their business model combines product manufacturing with a strong retail and franchise network, supported by online configurator tools and extensive product catalogs. The company leverages partnerships, such as with sestavsidvere.cz, to enhance customer experience. The website content and structure indicate a medium-sized enterprise with consistent branding and trust signals like warranties and store networks. The absence of WHOIS data does not detract from credibility given the professional online presence and detailed contact points.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place. Tracking and marketing tools are used responsibly with user consent. However, explicit security headers like CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options are not confirmed and could be implemented to enhance protection. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact is a minor gap. Overall, the site is secure for typical e-commerce and informational use but could benefit from additional security hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update all plugins and JavaScript libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to reflect evolving regulations and best practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Solodoor.cz
Description
Solodoor.cz is a company specializing in interior and entrance doors, door frames, and related products with a five-year warranty. They offer a wide range of door types including interior doors, entrance doors, steel doors, fire doors, and special doors. The company targets residential customers, developers, and partners in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. They operate a network of branded stores and contractual dealers across these countries.
Key services
Manufacture and sale of interior doors, Manufacture and sale of entrance doors, Steel and fire doors, Door configuration tools, Retail and franchise store network
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Swiper.js, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Pinterest tracking, Responsive Lightbox, Breeze caching plugin, Portadesign Cookie Consent
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel with consent
  • Cookie consent mechanism present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Pinterest tracking
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Pinterest tracking
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating privacy protection or registry limitations
  3. Comprehensive product catalog and retail network information
  4. Use of modern web technologies and tracking with consent
  5. No visible security or privacy policy gaps
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries like Swiper.js for UI components and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site loads multiple external resources including fonts, tracking scripts, and lightbox plugins. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and responsive design. SEO is supported by structured data (JSON-LD) and meta tags. The site uses Breeze caching and Portadesign cookie consent plugins to enhance performance and compliance. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could be improved with enhanced security headers and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with solodoor.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review solodoor.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.