Skip to main content

Security report for solice.fr

Groupe Solice · Energy · France

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Groupe Solice operates as a business group associated with companies in the energy sector, linking to partners such as Inpal Energies, Wannitube, and Effical. The website is minimalistic, serving primarily as a portal linking to partner sites rather than providing detailed business information or services directly. The domain is well-established since 2005 and registered with a reputable French registrar, OVH, indicating legitimacy and consistency with the French market focus. Technically, the website is very basic, consisting mainly of a single HTML page with an image map linking to partner domains. There is no evidence of modern web technologies, CMS usage, or analytics tools. The site lacks mobile optimization, accessibility features, and SEO best practices, which limits its digital maturity and user experience. From a security perspective, the site does not present any advanced security measures such as security headers or privacy policies. There is no visible HTTPS enforcement data, but given the hosting provider, it is likely available though not confirmed. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements. No contact or incident response information is provided, which reduces transparency and trust. Overall, the website poses a low risk in terms of content safety as it contains no adult or questionable content. However, the minimal content and lack of compliance documentation reduce its credibility and professional appearance. Strategic improvements in security posture, privacy compliance, and content quality are recommended to enhance trust and user engagement.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching solice.fr

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Groupe Solice appears positioned as a small-sized business group in the French energy sector, acting as a holding or partnership entity linking several specialized companies. Its business model likely revolves around collaboration and shared services among its subsidiaries or partners. The lack of detailed business information or direct service offerings on the website suggests a focus on B2B relationships rather than direct consumer engagement. The presence of three partner domains indicates a networked ecosystem, potentially providing complementary energy-related products or services. The company benefits from a long domain history, which supports market presence, but the minimal online footprint limits competitive advantage and visibility. There is no evidence of certifications, trust signals, or marketing tools, which could be areas for growth to improve market positioning and customer confidence.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is basic and lacks several best practices. There is no evidence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates a gap in GDPR compliance. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting the ability to report or respond to security issues. While no vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the limited content, the minimal technical implementation and lack of modern security features suggest a low maturity level. The website should implement HTTPS if not already done, add security headers, and publish privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure data transmission.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Introduce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security or abuse contacts to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  5. Enhance website content quality, mobile optimization, and accessibility to improve user experience and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Groupe Solice
Description
Groupe Solice appears to be a group or holding entity associated with companies in the energy sector, as indicated by the linked partner sites Inpal Energies, Wannitube, and Effical.
Key services
Energy solutions and services via associated companies
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, Image map
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is minimalistic with very limited content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or forms present.
  4. No security headers or advanced technical features detected.
  5. Website uses an image map linking to partner companies.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. No social media or email contacts found.
  8. Hosting is with OVH, a reputable French hosting provider.
  9. Website is not mobile optimized and lacks accessibility features.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using basic HTML with an image map linking to partner domains. There is no evidence of CMS usage, JavaScript frameworks, or analytics tools. Hosting is provided by OVH, a reputable French hosting provider. The site lacks mobile responsiveness and accessibility features, which are critical for modern web standards. SEO optimization is minimal due to the absence of meta tags beyond the title and no structured data or Open Graph tags. Performance is likely moderate given the simple content but could be improved with modern web practices. The technical debt is high due to outdated design and lack of enhancements, presenting modernization opportunities to improve business operations and digital presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 55/100Medium36 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with solice.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review solice.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.