Skip to main content

Security report for solenvisflowmeters.com

Solenvis Flowmeters · Energy · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Solenvis Flowmeters is a UK-based company specializing in the supply and installation of energy flow meters with over 20 years of industry experience. Their website presents a comprehensive range of services including energy surveys, flow meter demonstrations, consultation, installation, training, monitoring, calibration, and certification. The company targets UK businesses seeking energy efficiency and accurate flow measurement solutions. Technically, the website employs legacy JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.7.2 and uses Google Analytics for tracking, with basic cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, the site lacks HTTPS and modern security headers, which poses security risks. The absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although the website content and social media presence suggest a legitimate business. Overall, the website is professional and content-rich but requires significant improvements in security posture and domain registration transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching solenvisflowmeters.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
83
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the energy sector, focusing on flow metering solutions for industrial and commercial clients in the UK. Their business model is B2B, offering both products and services with a strong emphasis on customer support and after-sales service. The website indicates partnerships and a stable customer base, with a clear market position as an experienced specialist. Revenue streams likely include equipment sales, installation services, training, and maintenance contracts. The company leverages social media channels for outreach and maintains a professional online presence. However, the lack of visible company registration details and domain WHOIS data may impact trust among potential clients.

Security posture

The website's security posture is moderate to low. Key issues include the absence of HTTPS, outdated JavaScript libraries with known vulnerabilities, and lack of security headers. While Google reCAPTCHA is implemented on forms, there is no evidence of advanced security policies or incident response contacts. Privacy and cookie policies are present, indicating some compliance awareness. The missing WHOIS data and lack of domain registration transparency reduce overall trust. The site would benefit from immediate implementation of SSL/TLS, updating third-party libraries, and adding security headers to improve protection against common web threats.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS across the entire website to secure data in transit and improve user trust.
  2. Update all JavaScript libraries and dependencies to their latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Publish clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to enhance security transparency.
  5. Clarify domain registration details and ensure WHOIS information is accurate and consistent with business identity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Solenvis Flowmeters
Description
Energy flow meter supply and installation across the UK, Solenvis Flowmeters, are experts in energy metering with over 20 years’ experience. They provide a fully supported approach to flow measurement and control including pre-sales consultation, commissioning, training, monitoring, and after-sales maintenance support.
Key services
Energy Surveys and Audits, On-site Flow Meter Demonstration, Flow Measurement Consultation, Flow Meter Installation & Commissioning, Training, Monitoring & Control, Flow Meter Calibration, Flow Meter Verification and Certification
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.7.2, jQuery UI 1.8.20, Coda Slider 3.0, Google Analytics (ga.js), Google reCAPTCHA, Modernizr 1.7, Respond.js, TinyBox
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookie Consent by Silktide
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, indicating domain may be unregistered or WHOIS data is private or unavailable.
  3. Website uses outdated JavaScript libraries with potential security risks.
  4. No HTTPS detected in canonical or Open Graph URLs, indicating lack of SSL/TLS.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and linked in footer.
  6. Contact phone number is prominently displayed in header.
  7. Social media links to LinkedIn, Twitter, and Facebook are present.
  8. Website content is business-focused, professional, and relevant to energy flow metering.
  9. No visible security headers or advanced security policies detected.
  10. Google Analytics is used for tracking with cookie consent mechanism.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a legacy technology stack including jQuery 1.7.2, jQuery UI 1.8.20, and Coda Slider 3.0, which are outdated and may introduce security risks. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking, and cookie consent is managed via a third-party service. The site lacks HTTPS and modern security headers, which are critical for protecting user data and preventing attacks. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site structure and navigation are clear, but modernization of the tech stack and security enhancements are needed to reduce technical debt and improve resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with solenvisflowmeters.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review solenvisflowmeters.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.