Skip to main content

Security report for solar.pl

Solar Polska · Energy · Poland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Solar.pl represents a well-established Polish company specializing in electrical supplies, industrial automation, lighting, and green transformation services. Founded in 1999, the company positions itself as a key partner in the energy sector, targeting professionals and businesses involved in electrical and industrial automation markets. The website reflects a medium-sized enterprise with consistent branding and a clear business focus on wholesale and service provision in its sector. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, Select2, and integrates advanced marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot for consent management, Visual Website Optimizer for A/B testing, and Splunk UXM for user experience monitoring. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security headers and DNSSEC is not enabled, representing areas for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or blocking mechanisms were detected. Privacy compliance is partial, with cookie consent present but no explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in the analyzed content. Overall, Solar.pl demonstrates a solid digital presence with room for enhancement in privacy transparency and security hardening. Strategic recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy policies, enhancing security headers, and publishing clear contact and incident response information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching solar.pl

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
69
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Solar.pl operates in the energy sector with a focus on electrical supplies and industrial automation, serving a professional audience in Poland. The company benefits from a long domain history dating back to 1999, indicating market stability and experience. Its business model centers on wholesale distribution and partnership services, with key offerings in lighting and green transformation aligning with current market trends toward sustainability. The integration of advanced marketing and analytics tools suggests a data-driven approach to customer engagement and growth. However, the absence of visible contact details and formal policies on the website may limit customer trust and regulatory compliance. The company appears to maintain a moderate market position with potential for expansion through enhanced transparency and digital maturity.

Security posture

The website maintains a good baseline security posture with enforced HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms. However, the lack of DNSSEC and missing explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security robustness. The use of multiple third-party scripts introduces potential risk vectors that require ongoing monitoring. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or critical vulnerabilities was found. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, indicating a gap in transparency and preparedness. Enhancing these areas would strengthen the security culture and compliance stance of the organization.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve transparency and GDPR compliance.
  2. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Publish clear contact information including security incident response contacts to improve trust and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities and ensure compliance with privacy regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Solar Polska
Description
Solar.pl to więcej niż hurtownia elektryczna Solar Polska to partner w zakresie, elektryki. automatyki przemysłowej, oświetlenia i zielonej transformacji.
Key services
Electrical supplies, Industrial automation, Lighting solutions, Green transformation services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Select2, Swiper, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), Splunk (UXM agent)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No DNSSEC enabled (potential improvement area)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads, Facebook Pixel, Visual Website Optimizer
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Ads, Facebook Pixel, Visual Website Optimizer
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Visual Website Optimizer, Splunk UXM agent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and fully functional
  2. Uses multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in provided content
  4. Cookie consent implemented via Cookiebot
  5. WHOIS data shows long domain age and consistent registration
  6. No security headers explicitly detected in HTML content
  7. No contact information explicitly found in provided HTML content
  8. Website targets electrical and industrial automation sectors in Poland
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom CMS with a modern front-end stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and Select2, complemented by advanced marketing and analytics integrations such as Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Visual Website Optimizer, and Splunk UXM agent. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. SEO practices are adequate with proper meta tags and viewport settings. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. Hosting details are not explicit but the domain is registered with a reputable registrar. The site uses multiple asynchronous scripts for tracking and optimization, which may impact load times but enhance marketing effectiveness. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with solar.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review solar.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.