Skip to main content

Security report for solaid.de

Solaid - alternative Energiesysteme GmbH · Energy · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Solaid - alternative Energiesysteme GmbH is a small regional company specializing in solar and photovoltaic energy solutions based in Auerbach/Opf, Germany. The company offers comprehensive services from consultation to installation, targeting private and commercial customers in the local region. Their market position is that of a trusted local expert in alternative energy systems, with a professional online presence that supports their business objectives. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, integrating modern technologies such as hCaptcha for security and OpenStreetMap for location services. The site is well-optimized for SEO and mobile devices, with a cookie consent mechanism ensuring GDPR compliance. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in accessibility. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS, employs security headers, and uses bot protection mechanisms. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the site lacks a dedicated security policy or incident response information, which could enhance trust and preparedness. Overall, the website demonstrates a solid digital maturity for a small business, with good privacy compliance and business credibility. Strategic improvements in security transparency and accessibility could further strengthen their posture and customer trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
60/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching solaid.de

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
60
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Solaid operates in the energy sector focusing on photovoltaic and solar energy solutions. Their business model revolves around providing end-to-end services including consultation, planning, and installation of solar systems. The company targets regional customers in and around Auerbach/Opf, positioning itself as a specialist in alternative energy. The website content and structured data reflect a professional approach with clear contact channels and trust signals such as GDPR compliance and cookie management. No evidence of large-scale partnerships or subsidiaries was found, indicating a focused local operation. The use of modern web technologies and SEO tools suggests an intent to maintain competitive visibility in their niche market.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture for a small business. HTTPS is enforced with strong SSL configuration, and multiple security headers are present to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. The integration of hCaptcha protects against automated abuse. Cookie consent is managed via a compliant banner, supporting GDPR requirements. No security policy or incident response contacts are published, which is a gap in transparency and preparedness. No vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected in the provided data. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing formal security policies and incident response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Add incident response contact information or a dedicated page to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and dependencies to mitigate potential risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Solaid - alternative Energiesysteme GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Solaid - alternative Energiesysteme GmbH
Description
Von der Beratung bis hin zur Installation sind wir Ihr Partner für Solar und Photovoltaik in Auerbach/Opf und Umgebung.
Key services
Solar and Photovoltaic consultation, Installation of photovoltaic systems, Alternative energy system solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, jQuery, Real Cookie Banner plugin, OpenStreetMap integration, hCaptcha
Frameworks
Divi
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of hCaptcha for bot protection
  • Cookie consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Clear GDPR compliance with cookie consent and privacy policy.
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  5. Contact information is transparent and complete.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Divi theme, leveraging a modern tech stack including jQuery and third-party plugins such as Real Cookie Banner for consent management and hCaptcha for bot protection. OpenStreetMap is used for map integration. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and rich snippets, improving search engine visibility. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. The site uses standard SEO meta tags and Open Graph tags for social media sharing. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small business but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with solaid.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review solaid.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.