Skip to main content

Security report for softreal.cz

SQUID.CZ s.r.o. · Real Estate · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Softreal.cz is a Czech Republic based small business offering a SaaS real estate software platform tailored for real estate agents and agencies. The platform provides tools for property listing management, export to real estate portals, client inquiry management, AI-generated descriptions, and reporting features. The website is professionally designed with good content quality and clear navigation, targeting real estate professionals seeking efficiency in their operations. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Bootstrap, Google Analytics, and Facebook Pixel, with a cookie consent mechanism implemented to support privacy compliance. However, the absence of a published privacy policy and terms of service pages limits full compliance visibility. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage but lacks explicit security headers and vulnerability disclosure information. WHOIS data is unavailable, which raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, though the website content and business information appear consistent and professional. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy business front but would benefit from improved transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching softreal.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Softreal operates in the real estate software sector, providing a specialized CRM and property management solution for real estate agents in the Czech Republic. The business model is SaaS-based, targeting active real estate professionals with over 414 agents and 25,700 active listings reported. The company SQUID.CZ s.r.o. appears as the legal entity behind the platform. The website features customer testimonials with video references, enhancing trust and credibility. Marketing efforts include Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for user tracking and retargeting. The lack of WHOIS data and privacy policy are notable gaps. The company’s competitive advantage lies in AI-powered description generation and integrated inquiry management. Growth potential is supported by a clear call to action for free trials and direct contact options. No partner or subsidiary domains were identified.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, indicating basic encryption for data in transit. Cookie consent is implemented, showing awareness of privacy regulations. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy, limiting transparency for security researchers. WHOIS data is missing, which is a red flag for domain legitimacy verification. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the analysis. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by adding security headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and ensuring domain registration transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Add a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure page to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Verify and ensure domain WHOIS data is publicly available or provide justification for privacy protection to improve trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SQUID.CZ s.r.o.
Description
Softreal is a real estate software system built based on the experience and needs of real estate agents. It is simple, fast, and efficient, offering tools for property listing management, export to real estate servers, and comprehensive office management.
Key services
Real estate listing management, Export of property offers to real estate servers, Client inquiry management, AI-generated property descriptions, Reporting for property owners
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Facebook Pixel, Bootstrap (carousel component)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  3. Cookie consent banner present and functional
  4. Contact information is clearly displayed with company email and phone
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification
  7. Use of modern web technologies and tracking tools
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking, and Facebook Pixel for retargeting. The site loads multimedia content such as videos and uses custom JavaScript for interactive elements like video controls and cookie consent management. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation clarity and SEO meta tags. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site build. Performance is moderate with no obvious blocking issues. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Technical debt appears low but could be improved by adding accessibility enhancements and security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with softreal.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review softreal.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.