Skip to main content

Security report for socomec.us

SOCOMEC USA · Energy · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SOCOMEC USA operates as a manufacturer specializing in electrical equipment focused on power control, safety, energy efficiency, power conversion, and energy storage solutions. The company targets industrial and commercial sectors requiring low-voltage electrical network performance enhancements. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and a broad product catalog, supporting a large enterprise business model within the energy sector. Technical infrastructure is based on Drupal CMS with modern analytics and marketing tools integrated, indicating a moderate to advanced digital maturity level. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, though the absence of explicit security headers and privacy policies suggests room for improvement. The lack of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification but does not contradict the legitimacy suggested by the website content. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and professional business front with moderate technical and privacy compliance maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching socomec.us

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
40
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention socomec.us, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for socomec.us right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SOCOMEC USA holds a strong market position as a specialized electrical equipment manufacturer with a global footprint, evidenced by multiple regional domains. Their business model centers on manufacturing and distributing power-related electrical components and solutions, serving energy managers, electrical engineers, and contractors. The website's comprehensive product menus and support links indicate a customer-focused approach. Integration of analytics and marketing tools suggests active engagement in digital marketing and customer insights. However, the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies may impact compliance perceptions. The company appears to maintain a consistent brand identity and professional content, supporting high business credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive information. The use of reputable analytics platforms and marketing tools is balanced with implied consent mechanisms, though explicit privacy and cookie policies are not found in the provided content. The absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS is a notable gap. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not present, which could be improved to enhance security transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from enhanced header configurations and clearer privacy compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Provide clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  4. Verify and publish WHOIS domain registration details or ensure privacy protection is justified and transparent.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to ensure they comply with privacy regulations and do not introduce vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SOCOMEC USA
Description
Electrical equipment manufacturer specializing in the energy performance of low-voltage electrical networks.
Key services
Power control and safety, Energy efficiency, Power conversion, Energy storage
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal CMS, Font Awesome 6, Google Tag Manager, Piwik PRO analytics, Abtasty A/B testing
Frameworks
Bootstrap (navbar classes)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of analytics with consent mechanisms implied

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Piwik PRO
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Piwik PRO, Abtasty
Marketing tools
Piwik PRO, Abtasty
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content rich
  2. No WHOIS data available, limiting domain trust verification
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found in provided content
  4. Contact available via forms and support pages
  5. Use of modern analytics and marketing tools
  6. No security headers detected in provided data
  7. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal CMS, leveraging modern front-end libraries such as Font Awesome 6 and Bootstrap for responsive design. Analytics and marketing integrations include Google Tag Manager, Piwik PRO, and Abtasty, indicating a mature approach to user tracking and optimization. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts to improve user experience. However, the lack of explicit security headers and privacy policy pages suggests technical debt in compliance and security best practices. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional website but could be enhanced with improved security configurations and compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with socomec.us. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review socomec.us.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.