Skip to main content

Security report for socialwick.com

SocialWick · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SocialWick is a well-established social media marketing platform operating since 2017, offering a wide range of services including followers, likes, views, and other engagement metrics across major social media platforms such as Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, Facebook, and more. The company positions itself as a market leader with over a million customers and emphasizes fast delivery, premium quality, and affordable pricing. The website is professionally designed with good navigation and mobile optimization, supporting a positive user experience. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and Cloudflare Insights, hosted behind Cloudflare's infrastructure for performance and security. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and secure forms, though some security headers are missing and no explicit cookie consent mechanism is present, which may affect privacy compliance. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, but the business operations and content appear legitimate and professional. Overall, SocialWick presents a credible and functional platform for social media marketing services.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching socialwick.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SocialWick operates in the media sector as an e-commerce platform specializing in social media marketing services. Its competitive advantage lies in its broad service portfolio, market leadership since 2017, and a large customer base. The business model focuses on selling social media engagement services to influencers, content creators, and businesses aiming to enhance their online presence. Revenue streams likely include direct sales of social media packages and affiliate/reseller partnerships. The company maintains a customer support system available 365 days a year and offers affiliate and reseller programs to expand its market reach. Strategic observations include the importance of maintaining trust through quality services and expanding compliance measures to meet evolving privacy regulations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, secure form handling with CSRF tokens, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the lack of comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap that could be exploited in certain attack scenarios. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. GDPR compliance is partially addressed through a privacy policy, but the absence of a cookie consent mechanism is a notable compliance gap. Overall, the security culture appears functional but could benefit from enhancements in header implementation, incident response readiness, and privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  2. Introduce an explicit cookie consent banner/mechanism to improve GDPR compliance and user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a formal security policy and provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security culture.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate risks from vulnerable dependencies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SocialWick
Description
SocialWick is a leading social media marketplace offering services to buy followers, likes, views, and other social media engagement metrics across multiple platforms. The company emphasizes fast delivery, premium quality, and low prices, serving over a million customers since 2017.
Key services
Instagram Followers, Instagram Likes, YouTube Subscribers, TikTok Followers, Facebook Likes, Spotify Plays, Twitter Followers, SoundCloud Plays, IGTV Views, LinkedIn Followers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare Insights, FontAwesome, Poppins font, Raleway font
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with CSRF tokens

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional social media marketing platform with a broad service offering.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which limits domain trust verification.
  3. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via web form only.
  4. No cookie consent banner detected, which may impact GDPR compliance.
  5. Security headers are not fully implemented; HTTPS is present.
  6. Affiliate and reseller programs are offered, indicating business scale.
  7. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  8. Website uses modern fonts and scripts with good mobile optimization.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and Cloudflare Insights for performance monitoring. Fonts used include Poppins and Raleway, contributing to a modern and clean design. The site is hosted behind Cloudflare, which provides CDN and security features. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph tags, and structured JSON-LD data. However, there is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Technical risks include incomplete security headers and lack of cookie consent mechanisms, which should be addressed to improve compliance and security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with socialwick.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review socialwick.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.