Skip to main content

Security report for socialaction.dk

Sundhedsblog.dk · Healthcare · Denmark

High risk. 14 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

33/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sundhedsblog.dk is a Danish health and wellness website offering a combination of informative articles and e-commerce product sales focused on skincare, wellness, supplements, haircare, and fitness equipment. The site targets individuals seeking practical advice and products to support a healthier lifestyle. Technically, the website employs modern front-end technologies such as Bootstrap and Swiper.js, but uses an outdated jQuery version. The site is mobile optimized and well structured, providing a good user experience. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and secure form usage, but lacks important security headers and visible privacy or cookie policies, which are compliance gaps. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the website's claims, indicating legitimacy. The site would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

14 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: RDP

      Port 3389 (RDP) is publicly accessible - RDP - Remote Desktop, prime ransomware target

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to RDP using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching socialaction.dk

This scan found 32 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
33

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the healthcare and retail sectors, combining content marketing with product sales. It serves a niche market in Denmark focused on health-conscious consumers. The business model leverages content to attract visitors and convert them into customers through product offerings. The presence of multiple product categories and regular article updates suggests an active content and commerce strategy. The site maintains a consistent brand image and has a social media presence on Facebook. However, the lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers may limit customer trust and engagement. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the data provided.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and secure form submissions. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The use of an outdated jQuery version could expose the site to known vulnerabilities. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and lack of consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and make it easily accessible on the website.
  2. Add a cookie policy and a consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  3. Update jQuery to the latest stable version to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  4. Configure and deploy essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sundhedsblog.dk
Description
Sundhedsblog.dk is an online guide providing inspiration, knowledge, and practical advice for living a healthier and more balanced life. It covers topics such as nutrition, exercise, mental health, sleep, stress management, and sustainable lifestyle choices. The site also features product listings in categories like skincare, wellness, supplements, haircare, and fitness equipment.
Key services
Health and wellness articles, Product e-commerce in skincare, wellness, supplements, haircare, and fitness equipment
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery 1.11.0, Bootstrap 5.3.0-alpha3, Swiper.js 9
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of secure forms (POST method)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is limited to a contact page with a form; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  4. The site uses modern front-end libraries and frameworks but uses an outdated jQuery version.
  5. No visible security headers detected in the HTML content.
  6. Social media presence limited to Facebook link.
  7. Content is well structured and relevant to health and wellness topics.
  8. E-commerce product listings are detailed and categorized.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack including Bootstrap 5 and Swiper.js for responsive design and interactive elements. It loads resources from reputable CDNs such as jsDelivr and Google Tag Manager. The HTML structure is valid and semantic, supporting SEO and accessibility to a basic degree. Performance is moderate, with lazy loading of images and preconnect hints for image domains. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version introduces technical debt and potential security risks. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site implementation. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. The site is mobile optimized and has clear navigation, but accessibility features could be enhanced for better compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with socialaction.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review socialaction.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.