Skip to main content

Security report for soamadorasbr.com

Media · Brazil

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.soamadorasbr.com operates as a niche adult content platform focusing on Brazilian amateur and homemade pornographic photos and videos. It targets an adult Brazilian audience interested in user-generated explicit content. The business model appears to rely on advertising revenue and affiliate partnerships, with content submission encouraged via email and contact forms. The site uses WordPress CMS with common plugins such as Yoast SEO and Contact Form 7, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Technical infrastructure includes Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking, but lacks advanced security headers and corporate contact details, which impacts trustworthiness. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but missing key security headers and no visible vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional but has significant gaps in privacy compliance, security best practices, and business credibility, which should be addressed to improve trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching soamadorasbr.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
75
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site holds a niche position in the adult media sector, focusing on amateur and homemade content primarily from Brazilian users. It leverages partnerships with multiple adult content sites to expand reach and monetization. The business model is content aggregation and advertising-driven, with user engagement through content submissions. The lack of formal company information and use of generic contact emails suggest a small-scale operation with limited corporate structure. Growth potential depends on maintaining content freshness and expanding affiliate partnerships. The partnership ecosystem is extensive within the adult content niche, but the absence of formal privacy and security policies may hinder broader market acceptance.

Security posture

Security maturity is low to moderate. The site uses HTTPS but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, exposing it to potential web-based attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. The use of generic Gmail contact emails instead of corporate domains reduces trust and complicates incident reporting. Tracking scripts are present without visible cookie consent mechanisms, raising privacy compliance concerns. Overall, the security posture requires significant improvements to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Establish and publish privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance measures and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  3. Use corporate domain email addresses for contact and security incident reporting to enhance professionalism and trust.
  4. Create a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and third-party scripts to reduce risk from vulnerable components.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Fotos Amadoras, Caseiras , Vídeos Amadores de Sexo , Porno Amador , Vídeos de sexo, Vídeos Pornos todos Brasileiros e Grátis
Key services
Hosting and publishing amateur photos and videos, Advertising space and affiliate marketing, User content submission via contact form
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Yoast SEO plugin, Contact Form 7 plugin, Page Links To plugin, M18 Parceiros plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
latinwayy.com, loboclick.com
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website hosts adult amateur and homemade pornographic content targeting Brazilian audience
  2. Content is primarily user-submitted or aggregated
  3. No privacy or cookie policy found despite use of tracking and ads
  4. Contact email is a generic Gmail address, reducing professional trust
  5. No security headers detected, exposing potential security risks
  6. WHOIS data missing, domain registration status unclear
  7. Multiple external partner domains linked, mostly adult content related
  8. Advertising relies on third-party ad networks with embedded iframes
  9. SEO optimized with Yoast plugin but content quality is basic
  10. Mobile optimization is good but overall design and UX are basic
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with standard plugins for SEO and contact forms. It uses jQuery and Google Analytics/Tag Manager for tracking. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and SEO, but accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate with some embedded iframes for advertising which may impact load times. The technical stack is common and well-supported but lacks advanced security configurations and modern frontend frameworks. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. There is opportunity to modernize the tech stack and improve performance and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with soamadorasbr.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review soamadorasbr.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.