Skip to main content

Security report for snoty.cz

SNOTY, s.r.o. · Retail · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SNOTY, s.r.o. is a Czech small business established in 1995 specializing in manufacturing promotional confectionery products such as hygienically packaged sugars, chocolate-covered almonds, biscuits, lollipops, and chocolates with custom advertising prints. The company holds a strong and stable market position in the Czech Republic, serving a diverse range of business customers seeking promotional items. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and good mobile optimization, leveraging common web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Google Analytics. Security measures include Google reCaptcha integration, but lack of visible security headers and missing privacy and cookie policies indicate room for improvement. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly reduces domain trustworthiness, but the website content and contact information appear legitimate and consistent with the business claims. Overall, the site presents a moderate security posture and good business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching snoty.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention snoty.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for snoty.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates a B2B business model focused on promotional confectionery products, targeting businesses of various sizes across sectors. Their competitive advantage lies in offering customized printing on confectionery with professional design support and reliable order fulfillment timelines. The website supports marketing efforts through social media channels and Google Analytics tracking. The absence of WHOIS data and privacy policies suggests potential compliance gaps. The company maintains multiple contact channels and physical presence in the Czech Republic, reinforcing trust. Growth opportunities may include enhancing digital privacy compliance and security posture to meet evolving regulatory standards.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level with HTTPS implied but not explicitly confirmed, use of Google reCaptcha for form protection, and no detected security headers such as CSP or HSTS. The absence of privacy and cookie policies and lack of incident response contacts indicate compliance and readiness gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. To improve security posture, the company should implement comprehensive security headers, publish privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, and establish clear incident response procedures. These steps will reduce risk and enhance customer trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with strong TLS configuration and verify SSL certificate validity.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance and user consent mechanisms.
  3. Deploy security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Publish incident response and security contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SNOTY, s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SNOTY, s.r.o.
Description
Česká společnost SNOTY, s.r.o. byla založena v roce 1995 a vyrábí reklamní cukrovinky jako hygienicky balené cukry (bílý, hnědý), mandle v čokoládě, karamelové a kakaové biskvity, lízátka, bonbónky a čokolády s možností reklamního potisku.
Key services
Production of promotional confectionery, Custom printing on confectionery, Professional design proposals, Order fulfillment within 21 to 35 days, Delivery according to carrier tariffs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Modernizr, Slick Carousel, Google Analytics, Google reCaptcha
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCaptcha for forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain registration trust analysis.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on main page.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple emails, phone numbers, and physical address.
  5. Social media presence on Instagram and Facebook is linked.
  6. Website uses common web technologies and includes Google Analytics and reCaptcha.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL status unknown.
  8. Content is business-focused, safe, and appropriate for general audiences.
  9. Navigation and design are professional and consistent.
  10. No forms with visible input fields detected in the main HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, Modernizr for feature detection, and Slick Carousel for sliders. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for analytics and marketing tracking. Google reCaptcha is integrated for bot protection. The site appears moderately performant with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. SEO optimization is basic with minimal meta keywords and description tags. Technical debt is low but could be improved by adding structured data and enhancing accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with snoty.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review snoty.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.