Skip to main content

Security report for snatch.lv

SNATCH · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Snatch.lv represents a modern Italian restaurant based in Riga, Latvia, recognized with the prestigious Bib Gourmand Michelin award for 2024-25. The business focuses on delivering bold and creative Italian cuisine, including homemade pastas and a curated selection of rare Italian wines, within a stylish industrial-themed venue. The website reflects a professional and visually appealing digital presence, leveraging Tilda CMS and multimedia content to engage visitors. Contact information including phone and email is clearly provided, supporting customer engagement and reservations. However, the site lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which are important for regulatory compliance and user trust. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics, but security headers and explicit security policies are not evident from the available data. WHOIS information could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration insights. Overall, the website is well-positioned in the hospitality sector with a strong brand and market presence but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching snatch.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The restaurant operates in the hospitality sector targeting fine dining customers and food enthusiasts in Riga. Its market positioning is strengthened by Michelin recognition, which serves as a competitive advantage. The business model centers on providing high-quality Italian cuisine and beverage services, including cocktails and rare wines. The website indicates partnerships with other hospitality brands, suggesting a collaborative ecosystem. Revenue streams likely include dine-in services, beverage sales, and possibly event hosting. The digital presence is modern but could improve in compliance and security transparency to support growth and customer trust.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses iframe embeds for video content, reducing some security risks. However, no explicit security headers were detected, and there is no visible privacy policy or cookie consent mechanism, which are critical for GDPR compliance. The absence of vulnerability disclosure and incident response information indicates a gap in security maturity. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. The security posture is moderate but requires improvements in policy transparency and technical security controls to reduce risk and enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and provide incident response contact information.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries for vulnerabilities and update them accordingly.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and mobile optimization to improve user experience and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SNATCH
Description
Snatch Riga is a modern Italian restaurant located in Riga, Latvia, offering bold Italian cuisine with creative pastas, rare wines, and a vibrant atmosphere in a chic, industrial space. It is recognized with the Bib Gourmand Michelin award for 2024-25. The restaurant emphasizes authentic regional Italian dishes, homemade pasta, and a bespoke cocktail list.
Key services
Italian dining, Creative pasta dishes, Rare and Italian-focused wines, Cocktails, Table booking
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery 1.10.2, Tilda CMS scripts and styles, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager (gtag.js), Kinescope video embeds
Frameworks
Tilda CMS
Platforms
Tilda hosting/CDN
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical and og:url https)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of iframe sandboxed video embeds

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed restaurant site with rich multimedia content.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with email and phone number.
  4. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit; no direct registrant info.
  6. Use of Tilda CMS and CDN for hosting and content delivery.
  7. Google Tag Manager used for analytics and tracking.
  8. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  9. Site content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Tilda CMS platform, utilizing HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and jQuery 1.10.2. It integrates Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. Video content is embedded via Kinescope iframes. The site is hosted on Tilda's CDN infrastructure, ensuring reasonable performance and availability. Mobile responsiveness is good, with adaptive layouts for different screen sizes. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. The site lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy controls, which are technical risks. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and functional but has room for security and compliance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with snatch.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review snatch.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.