Skip to main content

Security report for snack-media.com

Snack Media Ltd · Media · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Snack Media Ltd is a UK-based digital sports network and content marketing company specializing in monetizing sports and entertainment content for premium publishers and rights holders. Established in 2007, the company has built a strong market position with a medium-sized operation serving global clients and partners. Their services include inventory monetization, proprietary adtech solutions, and sponsorship activation, targeting publishers and advertisers in the media sector. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear business information and trusted partnerships. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern plugins and frameworks such as WPBakery Page Builder, Contact Form 7, and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, HubSpot, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Twitter Pixel. The site is mobile optimized with good SEO and basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate with CDN usage. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced, use of reCAPTCHA on forms, and cookie consent mechanisms. However, some security headers are not explicitly detected and no public security policy or incident response information is available. The WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual for an established business and reduces trust slightly. Overall, the site shows good security hygiene but could improve transparency and header implementation. The overall risk is moderate with no critical vulnerabilities detected. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, verifying domain registration details, and improving accessibility compliance to strengthen trust and compliance posture.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of snack-media.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching snack-media.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
80
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention snack-media.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
86
Employees
1
Customers
31
Third parties
54
Weak passwords
19%

Latest record dated 2025-06-30 · 5 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for snack-media.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –fives.snack-media.com2025-06-30

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Snack Media operates in the media sector focusing on digital sports content monetization. Their competitive advantage lies in proprietary adtech and a strong network of premium publishing partners and advertisers. The business model revolves around end-to-end inventory monetization services beyond programmatic advertising, leveraging direct premium demand and bespoke solutions. Revenue streams likely include advertising commissions, technology licensing, and sponsorship activations. The target customers are digital publishers and advertisers in sports and entertainment verticals. Growth indicators include a broad global partner base and integration with major brands like Nike, Samsung, and Google. The partnership ecosystem is robust, enhancing market reach and credibility. The company demonstrates strategic maturity with a focus on innovation and tailored client services.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple anti-bot and tracking technologies deployed. Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms reduces spam and abuse risk. Cookie consent and privacy policies indicate GDPR compliance efforts. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to clickjacking or content injection risks. No incident response or security contact information is publicly available, which limits transparency and readiness perception. The missing WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration legitimacy, though the professional site content mitigates suspicion. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved with enhanced header policies and documented incident response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  2. Publish a public security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Verify and update domain WHOIS registration details to ensure consistency and legitimacy.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing to proactively identify and remediate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Snack Media Ltd
Registration number
06120966
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Snack Media Ltd
Description
Snack Media monetise sports and entertainment content on behalf of the world’s most premium and progressive publishers & rights holders.
Key services
Inventory monetisation, Adtech solutions, Publisher services, Sponsorship activation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WPBakery Page Builder, Contact Form 7, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter Universal Website Tag, HubSpot Analytics and Messaging, Google reCAPTCHA v3
Frameworks
WPBakery Page Builder
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
InMobi
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter Universal Website Tag, HubSpot Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies present with consent mechanisms
  4. Multiple trusted analytics and marketing tools integrated
  5. WHOIS data missing or domain unregistered in public VeriSign database
  6. Contact information clearly provided including email, phone, and address
  7. No adult or questionable content detected
  8. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (WordPress)
  9. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with WPBakery Page Builder and Contact Form 7 plugins, indicating a common and well-supported infrastructure. It integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, HubSpot, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Twitter Pixel, reflecting a mature digital marketing strategy. The site uses CDN hosting for static assets, improving load times and availability. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) are properly implemented, enhancing search engine visibility. Technical risks include potential plugin vulnerabilities if not regularly updated and missing security headers that could expose the site to certain web attacks. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but requires ongoing maintenance and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 58/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with snack-media.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review snack-media.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.